Why do westerners glaze this guy when pajeets hate him?

>>17857636 (OP)
He was peaceful and fairly respectable.

>>17857636 (OP)
The only Indians hating on a Mahatma are the western-wannabe Indians. The corrupted Indians. The desis.

>>17857636 (OP)
I know that redditors do hate him

>>17857636 (OP)
>Why do westerners glaze this guy
Because he begged the whites for mercy rather than rebelling against them violently
>when pajeets hate him?
The Indians who hate him are either
-Hindutva supremacists who hate pacifism and want to return to the Kshatriya warrior society of the Vedas
-other Hindu chauvinists who resent losing Pakistan

>>17857636 (OP)
Because he was - for his time - the master of PR. That outfit he's wearing there isn't an accident, it was carefully chosen to promote a certain image of him, specifically the image of a 'poor and humble Indian peasant'. He wasn't that, in his wildest dreams, but he figured out how to exploit and capitalise on the empathy and romanticism that can run to excess in western/British culture. 'Mahatma' Karamchand Ghandi had the most privileged and British education that anybody at that time could have had, even spending three years studying at University College London (at a time when British university enrolment was less than 1%), and he knew how to play the system.

>guy resolves national-level crisis without bloodshed
Gee, why would the moderate majority like him, but the violent, vindictive fringe nutters hate him?

He slept with children

>>17858453
he knew how to appeal to Indians too
don't forget that British rule relied an awful lot on Indian collaboration, there simply weren't enough Brits in India to govern it without their help. And the educated Indians working in the British bureaucracy became a lot of the INC's early base.

>>17857636 (OP)
White people only like browns when they're submissive.

>>17858730
Based. Western society was strongest when girls as young as 12 married. Now we have to deal with school shootings and massive suicide rates because we force men to marry 35 year old spinsters after they're "ready to settle down".

>>17857636 (OP)
Hindus killed Gandhi because he was peaceful and forward-facing.

Hindus try to blame independence and partition all on him even though there were many other factors.

>>17858730
better than sleeping with old people

>>17859292
Gandhi was the opposite of submissive though. He actively protested the British government and agitated for Indian independence. He simply did so nonviolently.

>>17859448
>He simply did so submissively
Yeah that's what I said. Thanks.

>>17857636 (OP)
The same reason why MLK is widely celebrated in America while Malcolm X and the Black Panther Party are more controversial

>>17857636 (OP)
Leaders glazed by the west but hated by their people are guaranteed to be among the shittiest, look at Gorbachev

>>17859455
You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded