← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17857636

18 posts 2 images /his/
Anonymous No.17857636 [Report] >>17857639 >>17857722 >>17858026 >>17858041 >>17858453 >>17859292 >>17859442 >>17859593 >>17859817
Why do westerners glaze this guy when pajeets hate him?
Anonymous No.17857639 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
He was peaceful and fairly respectable.
Anonymous No.17857722 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
The only Indians hating on a Mahatma are the western-wannabe Indians. The corrupted Indians. The desis.
Anonymous No.17858026 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
I know that redditors do hate him
Anonymous No.17858041 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
>Why do westerners glaze this guy
Because he begged the whites for mercy rather than rebelling against them violently
>when pajeets hate him?
The Indians who hate him are either
-Hindutva supremacists who hate pacifism and want to return to the Kshatriya warrior society of the Vedas
-other Hindu chauvinists who resent losing Pakistan
Anonymous No.17858453 [Report] >>17859289
>>17857636 (OP)
Because he was - for his time - the master of PR. That outfit he's wearing there isn't an accident, it was carefully chosen to promote a certain image of him, specifically the image of a 'poor and humble Indian peasant'. He wasn't that, in his wildest dreams, but he figured out how to exploit and capitalise on the empathy and romanticism that can run to excess in western/British culture. 'Mahatma' Karamchand Ghandi had the most privileged and British education that anybody at that time could have had, even spending three years studying at University College London (at a time when British university enrolment was less than 1%), and he knew how to play the system.
Anonymous No.17858463 [Report]
>guy resolves national-level crisis without bloodshed
Gee, why would the moderate majority like him, but the violent, vindictive fringe nutters hate him?
Anonymous No.17858730 [Report] >>17859294 >>17859446
He slept with children
Anonymous No.17859289 [Report]
>>17858453
he knew how to appeal to Indians too
don't forget that British rule relied an awful lot on Indian collaboration, there simply weren't enough Brits in India to govern it without their help. And the educated Indians working in the British bureaucracy became a lot of the INC's early base.
Anonymous No.17859292 [Report] >>17859448
>>17857636 (OP)
White people only like browns when they're submissive.
Anonymous No.17859294 [Report]
>>17858730
Based. Western society was strongest when girls as young as 12 married. Now we have to deal with school shootings and massive suicide rates because we force men to marry 35 year old spinsters after they're "ready to settle down".
Anonymous No.17859442 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
Hindus killed Gandhi because he was peaceful and forward-facing.

Hindus try to blame independence and partition all on him even though there were many other factors.
Anonymous No.17859446 [Report]
>>17858730
better than sleeping with old people
Anonymous No.17859448 [Report] >>17859455
>>17859292
Gandhi was the opposite of submissive though. He actively protested the British government and agitated for Indian independence. He simply did so nonviolently.
Anonymous No.17859455 [Report] >>17861461
>>17859448
>He simply did so submissively
Yeah that's what I said. Thanks.
Anonymous No.17859593 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
The same reason why MLK is widely celebrated in America while Malcolm X and the Black Panther Party are more controversial
Anonymous No.17859817 [Report]
>>17857636 (OP)
Leaders glazed by the west but hated by their people are guaranteed to be among the shittiest, look at Gorbachev
Anonymous No.17861461 [Report]
>>17859455
You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded