>Most obnoxiously nationalistic people in Europe
>Their entire history is them losing

To be fair you could say the same about any Slavic country

>>17861848 (OP)
The US is not at war with either Ukraine nor Russia and so I have no reason to denigrate either nation or its people.

>>17861848 (OP)
They literally conquered tons of land, if them losing it afterwards still makes them losers then the British and French are also losers.

>>17861848 (OP)
>lose for your entire history
>end up being the largest country on the planet
how does that happen, /his/ sisters?

>>17862467
Stomping on steppe monkeys and Siberian tribes. Also its easy to “own” land when it isn't developed or even accessible.

>>17861848 (OP)
Seems like someone got bootyblasted by that Poland thread

>>17861855
and Germany and France and India etc.

>>17861848 (OP)
Y u mad pjotr?

>>17862687
Except Germany and France can actually point to military successes even in defeat they make a good showing.
Slavs always go down like women.
They’re kicking, they screech, they get their legs spread. It’s just how Slavs are.
Germans, French, English, Swedish, these people are deadly even when they are losing.
Slavs are pretty much a non entity even when they’re winning.
Look at how many Slavs France killed, or Finland, or Germany.

i mean they are the last independent nation in europe, so that's not really a fair characterisation
rank list for last man standing kinda goes like this
ruskies (1990; still independent today) => krauts (lost independence 1945) => anglos/frenchoids (lost independence between 1916-1945) => everyone else.

>>17864415
>independant
Not implesive.

>>17861848 (OP)
>>Most obnoxiously nationalistic people in Europe
TRUE, admitting it as a russian.
>Their entire history is them losing
Come on man, you could have done a better thread.

>>17861848 (OP)
They constantly won against the Ottomans though

>>17865235
No they didnt

>>17861848 (OP)
>Their entire history is them losing
NAFO troons don't even trying anymore

>>17861848 (OP)
100000 ukrops about to be encircled in pokrovsk and here you are making these threads

>>17865256
Yes, they did. The only time they lost was when bongs and frogs intervened.

>>17862467
by not attacking anyone of course

>>17865814
>1710-1713
history board btw

>>17865304
10 more months.

>>17866549
Till Crimean beach party?

>>17862467
Geographic size is only a good thing when you can actually access that land and exploit resources that make it habitable. It's not a flex. It's an embarrassing display of mismanagement. At least they managed to get some natural gas out of it though.

>>17863742
>Slavs are pretty much a non entity even when they’re winning.
Anon, I...

>>17861848 (OP)
Nationalist ?
They eastern globohomo

>>17861848 (OP)
This thread was made by mamsers from pooland.

>>17861869
Really? War against (I assume) your nation is the only thing that could ever force you to admit that Russia is a shithole?

>>17866573
>Slavs lose a million men taking the easternmost city of proper Germany
yes? as I said, Slavs are a non-entity even when theyre winning.

>>17866608
>(You) see Anon, Slavshits lost thrembillion men (evendoe they lost something like 370 thousand actually) taking an insignificant city of Berlin in some pettty conflict, none of it mattered anyway, but if those were Swedish men...