>>17862541When you look at developed religions that rely on narratives, they usually head in a very similar direction. The example that brought this to my attention was Christianity v. Vedic traditions. They both propose an infinite source (and sustainer) of all being who has a hierarchy of spirits beneath for mediation. But the similarities are so profound that one of the most imactful elaborations on the Christian God was a book where an Orthodox Christian scholar was directly elaborating on Sat-Chit-Ananda, the essential attributes of Brahman.
Of course there are differences because each religion has something unique about themselves - in this case Christianity absolutely insists that personhood is divine and we only have diminutive versions of it that we need to perfect, whereas Vedic, Buddhist and Gnostic traditions say that personhood is just a default human thingy that needs to be left behind. And that's a profound disagreement. But the picture in which this disagreement is being had is way more similar than anyone would predict if religious stories were arbitrarily made up.
When it comes to smaller religions there are various tropes and paradigms that cults usually have. Some of them can be written off as direct consequence of human psychology (such as cults usually positing a spiritual origin of a human community), but some are a little more specific. For example Mircea Eliade describes deus otiosus - the idle god or the god who has abandoned a cult. To me as a Christian this checks out with the Biblical narrative: God was governing the Earth, the tower of Babel happens, he hands over the nations to smaller deities to focus on Hebrews, then starts wiping the floor with the deities because the Salvation has come through his Son. It's only natural smaller cults would start wondering why their deity suddenly went away. They were afraid of Christ. Similarly, we have records of pagans complaining that their rituals don't work when Christians are around.