>>17863389People opposed operation overlord and operation bagration both of which actually ended the war.
There were opponents of Torch as well which concluded the Nafri front.
The Ardennes worked despite many saying it wouldn’t.
Overlord worked despite many saying it wouldn’t.
Kursk didn’t work despite many saying it would.
>it didn’t workWhat Barbarossa? No it did work. It completely annihilated the Red Army, it actually destroyed more divisions than the Red Army had it was so successful.
While this wasn’t a knockout blow to say the largest offensive in history which took the most land captured the most enemies and put the Germans within striking distance of ALL Russian heavy industry as well as captured ALL heartland industry, I mean that’s a little silly to say it didn’t work.
>I define working solely as one shotting the SovietsI disagree. I think we can evaluate an operation differently.
>it had no chance of workingIf the Germans took Moscow and Leningrad by arriving before the British tanks did and the Russians dragged their feet and the Germans focused their efforts on these two cities, suppose they fell
>no it’s physically impossible for Moscow to fallExcept for all those times it did fall lmao.
But suppose Moscow fell, Leningrad shortly thereafter, and Stalin threw in for surrender.
You’d call it the most successful operation in human history.
It could have very easily “worked” whatever that means to you.
You’re just opposed to giving the Nazis any credit for anything because you’re juvenile and you think it will lead to hero-worship of your ideological opposition.
Grow the fuck up.