>intentionally makes it harder for humans to understand eachother
>then chooses to have humans deliver his messages in the form of books that now need to be retranslated multiple times and everyone constantly argues over regarding canon and verbosity
What the fuck is wrong with the Sky-Jew-Kaiju?

Hang yourself, nigger

Uhh..

You're supposed to generate loosh not think too much adamite

>>17862655 (OP)
>OP doesn't know about the different sacred people in different civilizations
Why are atheists so dumb?

>>17862667
This isn't an argument for Abrahamism, it's an argument for Deism

>>17862667
If you believe in God, you should not be a Christian, or a Muslim, or a Jew, an all-powerful God would not be this easy to refute, so if you believe in God as-is depicted in the Abrahamic Canon, all it means is that you're holding God to an incredibly low standard. I believe God is, at best, beyond our capabilities of understanding, and that the Bible is largely bullshit.

The moral of the story is we need to increase ICE funding

>>17862657
Have fun burning

>>17862690
No f you! You burn and honestly I don't care if you enjoy it or not. Serves you right asshat

>Lord, I don't know if it said "sons of Israel" or "sons of God" in this passage
>Clearly I cannot get help from the Church that specifically exists to explain these things
>I am so lost, how do I love my neighbour without getting these passages???

>>17862760
>Clearly I cannot get help from the Church that specifically exists to explain these things
Which Church? There are over 10,000 denomenations of Christianity out there

>>17862766
> Lord HELP!
> should I get convergent commentary from the Orthodox and Catholic , who account for 66% of all Christianity and are verifiably consistent with the Early Church and in many things even with many Second Temple Judaistic rabbis?
> or should I ask Tom from Bumfuck Alabama who just created a church online?

I don't mean to be mean, but most of these issues really fall apart quite quickly once you actually try to solve them instead of using them as excuses for inertia.

>>17862776
>Catholics and Orthodox are the only correct churches because they have the most followers
Ad populum fallacy

>>17862783
>t. Tom

>>17862786
>>17862776
Also, there are a lot of things these churches dissagree with eachother on, otherwise they wouldn't be different churches, so that's a shit argument friendo

>>17862790
Not exactly a lot, no. Show me any passage that you're having trouble interpreting and I can guarantee that 9 times out of 10 the Catholics and Orthodox will agree with each other's commentary and interpretation and even point out to you how their agreement on it can be traced historically. Again, these "problems" are really only problems for those who are directly motivated to remain inert instead of motivated to solve things. It's convenient to pretend that because someone in Alabama registered a new "church", suddenly it's more difficult to orient yourself in what is the Traditional interpretation of a passage. You don't take this approach in any other domain lol. Because in every other domain your identity isn't based on shrugging your shoulders.