>God made everything
>Even galaxies 188,128,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles away

You realize how retarded that is right?

>an infinite and all powerful God couldnt have made things that are far away um....he just couldnt!

>>17864241 (OP)
Maybe he gave up on Earth and is only showing himself to some other planet billions of lightyears from us and that's why we haven't seen him in thousands of years. Maybe Earth is just some random backwater that none of the divines give a fuck about

>>17864241 (OP)
God didn't have to make everything by hand, he just had to make a self-generating and self-sustaining universe

>>17864247
That all powerful and all knowing God made us and only us in his image and only this planet. Which begs the question about the rest of the cosmos. Despite your attempt to discredit the premise, it is a completely valid criticism.

>>17864241 (OP)
The "God" we worship is Man, who creates all of reality by his observation and imagination and narrativization of all things.

>>17864253
It’s really not.
How do you know he didn’t make these things for fun like he made certain animals and angels?

>>17864253
You're braindead. Not even a midwit, legitimately 90-100 IQ.

>>17864241 (OP)
they do, but they have infinite jewish copium to huff

>>17864253
Braindead you know Christians have written books postulating the possibility of aliens also being made in the image of God right lol

>>17864514
No they don't. What a silly disprovable lie. Why would you lie about something like that? Have you tried making a valid point instead?

>>17864507
there are non jewish and non christian sources dealing with the same issue.

>>17864241 (OP)
It's all just a fancy screensaver projection. If you go far enough up you'll tear through "outer space" like a piece of paper. Mark 1:10, "Just as Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove." Revelation 6:14, "The heavens receded like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place."

>>17864521
im not even christian and i know what that anon is talking about
The first argument is that God’s power is infinite, or in theological terms, that God is omnipotent. Therefore, if God could create one world, he could create multiple worlds. There is therefore no reason why there are not multiple ‘Earths’ in the universe. Although we live in a much more secular age than that experienced by Aquinas, this line of thought sometimes still appears in those with religious leanings who believe in life beyond Earth.

The second argument presented is that of quantity: life on Earth is inherently good, and so because God is good, it stands to reason that God would create multiple worlds as opposed to just one, to multiply the goodness. The nature of goodness is, after all, to spread goodness: as we say in our day, ‘sharing is caring’; or in the words of Jesus, ‘no one hides a lamp under a basket’.

The third argument is arguably the most abstract, but it basically states that because the world is made of matter, there is nothing stopping multiple worlds from existing, just as there is nothing stopping multiple men from existing.

>>17864529
however those don't spam /his/, so no need for me to shit down their throat

>>17864521

You're just uneducated, there's been plenty written on this, including fiction and nonfiction
I.e. Astrobiology and Christian Doctrine: Exploring the Implications of Life in the Universe

>In asking whether the presence of other life in the cosmos would compromise or threaten our human significance or standing, not least in relation to God, the idea of the human being as made in the image of God (the imago dei) is obviously central. In my experience of teaching, students often associate the image with distinction from other life, and a sense of superiority. The presence of other rational life would tend to threaten that. For my part, I cannot see why the imago dei should be comparative or competitive, or lessened in us were it also to be found elsewhere.
>I suggest that Christian theology has nothing to lose in accepting that other creatures could bear the image of God. Likeness is of its nature not a competitive matter. Moreover, the boundlessness of God's perfection likely sets up the imago dei to take varied forms, as finite reflections of the infinite. Even in respect to any single aspect of the image we might expect a variety of inflections.

So much bold ignorance on this board.

>>17864241 (OP)
what's more retarded is
>god (the jewish one) made this entire universe for us humans to explore
>even though he put an impenetrable firmament dome over us like a petri dish snowglobe
>and stopped us from building the tower of babel

>>17864253
it would be trivial for an all powerful god to create some filler content just for the heck of it. also your post literally proved that it was very necessary to create the rest of the cosmos. would be kind of awkward if creation simply "stopped" outside the solar system now would it?

>>17864253
god created the quadrillions of stars in the sky so I can say to the girl I love that god made all these stars to adorn her