>be considered ugly by modern standards and unable to procreate
>At one time you and people like you thrived in power and beauty standards were different
>Have to see examples of how you were kings in bronze and neolithic empires

Honestly not sure how they get by knowing how this feels. Are there any more examples of ugly people being the main standard for rulers?

>>17864306 (OP)
I don't believe that amerindians are particularly ugly in comparison to at least 2-3 other races. They're just squat fat Asians.

>bitch I was a 7 1000 years ago

>>17864306 (OP)
>desiring to lose protagonism in life to an offspring
fucking why?

>>17864312
Amerindians mog the vast majority of races out there, there's just a massive hate and exclusion campaign against them for obvious reasons

>>17864326
her dna results

>>17864328

>>17864326
>>17864331
Yeah people here always post ones that were raised in America subsisting off corn syrup. If you actually look at photos of Amerindian communities in Latin america they are basically indistinguishable from SEA.

>>17864338
60 IQ mindbroken spicjeets will unironically post photos of 70 year old farmer grannies from the Andes and will genuinely not realize that not all females from a certain race are geriatrics
racemixing was the absolute worst that could've happened to the amerindian race

>>17864349

>>17864355

>>17864375

>>17864382

>>17864388

>>17864326
>post a female
Retard doesnt get it
They only mocking the males

>>17864410
This the males get called ugly and bottom of totem for beauty standards cause of eugenic based tribal politics

>>17864488
>eugenic based tribal politics

interesting, can you expand on this?

>>17864326
>>17864331
Still mid by modern standards.

>>17864326
>>17864331
>>17864349
>>17864355
>>17864375
>>17864382
>>17864388
>>17864390
They would still be considered ugly by beauty standards. Globalization was a mistake.

>>17864306 (OP)
>This was seen as beautiful
Beauty standards screwed everyone

>>17864654
He would be an incel today.

>>17864652
no they wouldn't, contrary to popular belief, we're not living in the third reich where only hyperborean aryans are considered attractive

>>17864306 (OP)
Indigenous American people tend to be either very attractive or very ugly, the median tends towards ugly but any European who tries to cherrypick and post how attractive they are is deluded, in any race the majority of people are normie uggos and retards. The thing about south Americans is that they're unironically colonized and like pajeets and other disgusting theirs worlders like Asian bug people they think blonde hair blue eyes: automatically better. It's a peasant mindset that south Americans haven't been able to shake off, especially due to also being colonized by Americans (and by extension Jews) to hate themselves. Which leads the only ones to actually be proud of their ethnicity to be weird politically motivated communists supported by white wokeoids.

>>17864331
Hey retard did you know that native American phenotypes vary in peoples' because native Americans are not all one nation? Also did you know that individual people being ugly doesn't mean an entire race is ugly?

>>17864326
>>17864328

>1% Basque
>*Solutrean Hypothesizing Intensifies*

I know it's probably from a fling during colonial times, but an Anon can dream.

>>17864661
At least in my country, the only non-whites considered attractive are those who look very white, like Adriana Lima or Maluma.

>>17864664
They have completely different faces, starting with one having a narrow nose and a narrower face, and the other having a wide nose and a broad face. Coloring also plays an important role, because you think Jeets, despite having a facial structure more similar to Europeans, are considered uglier than East Asians.

>>17864664
I'm the one that posted:
>>17864326
>>17864331
>>17864349
>>17864355
>>17864375
>>17864382
>>17864388
>>17864390
this is a completely non-cherrypicked, no bullshit compilation of how unmixed amerindians look like, these people look completely average within their race. Spics, /pol/trannies and other agents in bad faith will argue otherwise because they're mindbroken trannies
>Which leads the only ones to actually be proud of their ethnicity to be weird politically motivated communists supported by white wokeoids.
Neither communists nor """whites""" in latin america care about indigenous issues, they're on their own except for the rare pro-amerindian latin american like me
>>17864667
what are you even babbling about faggot?

>>17864306 (OP)
>we half south america monkey half spaniards wuz the nogroid head statue people

>>17864410
All males of any given race are ugly. If you think any man is good looking then you are a fucking faggot with AIDs by definition.

>>17864693
I still find them ugly. Am I too mentally colonized? I'm latinx

>>17864652
Post chin, BMI, and hairline

>>17864700
yes, you're the average pathetic spicjeet mongrel, congratulations

>>17864694
>niggers existed in pre-Columbian America
>no I don't have any evidence but trust me or I'll have a meltdown
You are brown because you believe in feels > reals.

>>17864706
East Asians, both women and men, despite being relative cousins of Amerindians, are much more attractive.

>>17864706
Also the Amerindians themselves are mongrels because they are partly West Eurasian.

Native men can be handsome, but most Natives nowadays are obese so any possible attractive features are hidden under all the fat.

>>17864710
asians being considered attractive is a completely new phenomenom, my boomer dad thinks asian women are hideous chinks, compare this to the average anime watching zoomer who thinks asians are the most attractive race in existence, also there's barely any difference between an attractive asian girl and an attractive amerindian girl
>>17864715
no one that isn't permaonline cares or even knows what Ancient North Eurasians are

>>17864732
Amerindians are more distant from Asians than pajeets are from Europeans. It's as if a pajeets said there's no difference between a pajeets and a European.

This saudi man can pass as amerindian?

>>17864743
>there's no difference between a pajeets and a European
jeets are half indian jungle monkey half white aryan hybrids, some more monkey, some less

>>17864743
so? there's still virtually no difference between an attractive asian and an attractive amerindian, if anything I could argue that amerindians could be considered even more attractive under the current beauty standards considering they can have slender aquiline noses at much higher rates, rhinoplasty is huge in east asia

>>17864783
It's like saying there's no difference between a Nafri and a Italian. Amerindians are just ugly. There's a reason the people considered most attractive in SPIC countries are white.

>>17864790
>I'M AN INFERIOR SPIC MONGREL OKAY?
ok faggot, come up with another pathetic spic rationalization because you're too much of a faggot to have some self-esteem, this is genuinely why racemixing should be considered bio terrorism and why spic mongrels deserve genocide

The mayans.
Those dudes had noses even bigger than jews.
Image of King Pakal

>>17864799
I'm pardocel. At least I'm legitimately a mongrel and not an indio who larps as a mestizo like Mexicans and Peruvians.

>>17864790
>It's like saying there's no difference between a Nafri and a Italian.
There isn't.

>>17864835
Their noses aren't anywhere near jew size. Amerindians just have a barrow bridge and flat nostrils that make it seem bell shaped and larger than it is.

Most of us mexicans are mestizos, and we often are proud of our heritage from the indians.
Thats why we are called mexico in the first place, since Iturbide wanted to conmemorate the old aztec empire (mexico-tenochtitlan).
Peruvians on the other hand are often mestizos but at a 90% indigenous and 10% european.
Theres nothing bad with that but i always see peruvians posting in FB about how they are mestizos at 50/50 like us mexicans.
Peruanos must have more self steem