I want to present perhaps to you a new idea. Moral solipsism. Only I am morally correct. No other human, god, divine mortal immense small old young, no other existent being is moral. I alone am moral. Whatever I do is moral. Whatever others do is immoral. Thoughts on that idea?

boring

>>17865171 (OP)
>Thoughts on that idea
Narcissism. It's how a baby thinks, the whole world has to conform to your will. What is good is what you desire and what is bad is what you do not.

>>17865175
And how does that refute it?

>>17865175
Also you talk like a woman. Probably aren't one I don't think women come here but whatever.

>>17865180
The idea of a philosopher king is just that, infantile. Every human has the capability to discern reality, it's what we do best in the known universe. To think that only one of us can do it is akin to assuming only one bird can fly.

>>17865190
Yeah, I think there's a veil. Once you lift the veil, you're there. But I have never met in any day of my life anyone who has lifted it.

>>17865183
>>17865180
I'm just calling it what it is. You can operate however you wish but you will find that moral systems are designed to create peace among people, a set of agreed upon expectations. One like yours isn't concerned with peace but with satisfying your will.

>>17865198
You shouldn't think of it as satisfying any certain will. It's more like this, that I alone can see, and others cannot see, so they walk in darkness. I wish others to have sight as I do, and I will try hard, but in the end it's only the will of reality that will be manifest. No use in forcing myself to change the world.

>>17865195
The veil as you speak of does not exist. It is socially created by mysticism. Plato was one of the first to pose that a philosopher king is necessary and that he should be one using the cave allegory. It however completely undermines the fact that humans have survived before he was there, not because someone had to tell them what reality was but because they could use their senses and mind to categorize independently. Aristotle knew this which is why he stated "A=A", reality is what it is. There is no higher plane of existence where the chairiest chair exists like Plato says. Conveniently Plato did the same as you, naming himself as the sole person capable of ascertaining this World of Forms as he calls it. It serves nothing but to kill the confidence of the populace to make them more accommodating to mysticism (making shit up for your convenience).

>>17865171 (OP)
It's completely retarded because you're not going to be able to convince anyone else to adhere to it and the moment you start doing things that you consider moral but other consider to be immoral you will get your ass beat or in trouble with law enforcement.

>>17865171 (OP)
Nah political ethical solipsism. Its written in the first part of my first book which was published four years ago