What are your thoughts on “a history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind” ?

Personally I think it’s just conspiratorial BS, but some people seem to think it’s THE TRUTH.

>look up book
>allowed to borrow it if you sign in
>try to sign in
>use your phone
>find phone
>open up authentication
>it doesn't work, hasn't worked in two years
>go to the manual authentication
>app doesn't work, frozen, can't scroll
Phones are an actually useless technology

Don't worry boys I illegally pirated it from a russian website

Biggest claim in the book so far, when jews arrived in england with william the conqueror they increased taxes until the landowners ran out of money and gave the land to jews.

Citation: The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom 1000-1500 page 159

The combination of extended Jewish settlement and thus enhanced
contact between Jews and the broad English population, Jewish busi-
ness success, and the potent Jewish alliance with Henry II and his
court exacerbated antipathy toward the Jews. In effect, when the
monarchy tightened the screws on its Jews, through one or another
of the available fund-raising devices, the pressure was ultimately felt
by those in debt to the Jewish lenders. In order to meet the demands
of the king, Jews had no choice but to call in debts owed to them.
The Jews thus became a vehicle for royal access to Christian funds.
Serving as the medium for royal fiscal pressure hardly endeared the
Jews to an already hostile population.
The allegation of Jewish hatred of Christianity so intense as to
lead to murder of innocent Christians – the allegation that had first
surfaced in 1144 in Norwich – appeared with some frequency during
the reign of Henry II. It was raised at Gloucester in 1168, at Bury
St. Edmunds in 1181, and at Bristol in 1183. In all cases, memorials
were established to the purported young martyrs, thus maintaining
and spreading the allegation. Once again, however, the authorities
seem to have protected the endangered Jews assiduously, with no
known reports of reprisals

>>17865907
>The special arrangements for the estate of Aaron of Lincoln were unusual

Aaron of Lincoln
>Jewish financier
>richest person in england, wealth exceeded the King
>lent money to purchase monasteries
>fortune went missing being shipped to France
hmm

>>17865940
His next citation of importance is a white nationalist blog so I'm skipping that one

>>17866011
He then goes into blood libel...

So basically he's saying that the french brought the jews into britian and then the french kings used usury to seize lands and possibly ship the wealth back to france. English people accused the jews of literal murder for this and blood libel. The magna carta addressed the debt slavery put on the english in order to fight the french king's wars

>>17866032
Jews arrived back in England under Queen Elizabeth and were using fractional reserve banking which was developed by Italian Jews, with interest rates as high as 80% APR.

Citation: History of the Bank of England, A. M. Andreadēs, page 47

"The Goldsmiths were not the kind of people to be satisfied with so little. We have seen the interest which the asked from the King; and they were even more exacting in dealing with ordinary merchants, especially the poor ones, from who they demanded the highest rates."

"This is an undoubted fact, and is proved by a number of authorities whom reference has already been made. The Author of Bank of Credit p. 18, states that although interest rates were regulated to 6 percent, poor men could not get loans below 33% APR. And were lucky not to be asked for 60, 70 or even 80%. See above p. 34"

Page 34

"Before 1665, the goldsmiths did not ask more than 8% interest, but their demands increased with the King's. The rate of interest was determined by the King's bounty."

Page 35
"Soon they were asking for 20 and 30% interest. Pepys tells us that as early as 1663 the Treasury was paying 15 and 20% APR to Jewish goldsmiths. Some goldsmiths were making according to Pepys, 10,000 pounds a year in the 1660's."

"It's possible contemporary writers exaggerated but it is for certain that the Treasury paid 12% interest to Jewish goldsmiths."

>Charles being in want of money, the bankers took 10 per cent, of him barefacedly, and by private contracts on many bills, orders, tallies, and debts of that King, they got 20, sometimes 30 per cent., to the great dishonour of Government. This great gain induced the goldsmiths to become more and more lenders to the King, to anticipate all the revenues, to take every grant of Parliament into pawn as soon as it was given ; also to outvie each other in buying and taking to pawn bills, orders, and tallies, so that, in effect, all the revenue passed through their hands

>>17866101
According to the author the bill that created the Bank of England, created and passed by less than 10% of the House, all Whigs, was 2/3rds about tariffing imports

>>17866209
The gist of the first two-thirds of the bill details the necessity to levy
a complicated array of new rates,duties and taxes on ships,beer, ale
and other liquors.The true purpose of these taxes was that they were
needed in order to fund the interest on all future government loans.
Shortly thereafter further taxes were introduced including a land tax,
paper tax, poll tax, salt tax, stamp tax and window tax, which
replaced the hearth or chimney tax. Other taxes initiated were a tax
on pedlars, a tax on hackney coaches, a tax on births, marriages and
deaths and lastly a tax on bachelors.[54] However, the most punitive
tax introduced was an income tax levied at a rate of 20%. It was
applied not only to companies, but labourers too

>>17866214
Within two years of its establishment in 1696 the Bank of England
had £1,750,000 worth of bank notes circulating with a gold reserve of
only 2% or £36,000

On 1 May 1707 the union between Scotland
and England was established, motivated in no small way by the
necessity to seize control of the Royal Mint in Edinburgh which took
place in 1709

By 1720 after the conclusion of the War of the Spanish Succession
(1701-14) the national debt had risen to £30 million with the war
itself having cost £50 million.[57] After the American War of
Independence (1775-83), which had been fought after the colonists
had been forced to replace their debt – and largely interest-free
colonial scrip with English money and had resulted in 50%
unemployment, the national debt soared to £176 million

>>17866226
William Cobbe (1763-1835)
at that time perceived what was afoot and wrote as follows: “I set to
read the Act of Parliament by which the Bank of England was
created. The investors knew what they were about. Their design was
to mortgage by degrees the whole country…lands…houses…
property…labour. The scheme has produced what the world never
saw before - starvation in the midst of abundance.”[64

t the start of World War I in 1914 the national debt stood at £650
million.[68] On March 31, 1919 it had increased to £7.434 billion[69] of
which £3 billion is still outstanding after 95 years at an interest rate
of 3.5% per annum. In the 1919 budget 40% of expenditure was
allocated to the payment of interest. In World War II the national
debt rose by almost 300% from £7.1 billion in 1939 to £20.1 billion in
1945. As at March 2017 it stands at over £1.8 trillion

However, if one includes all liabilities, including state and public pensions, it
exceeds £5 trillion.

On 14 February 1946 the Labour government nationalised the Bank
of England.

>>17866250
The silver exchange in the US was abolished and replaced by a gold standard by means of an Act Revising and Amending the Laws Relative to the Mints, Assay Offices and the Coinage of the United States. On 17 January 1873 this act was passed by the Senate. According to a sworn affidavit of Mr. Frederick A. Luckenbach dated 9 May 1892, he had learnt from Mr. Ernest Seyd in London that the demonetisation of American silver had been expressly ordered by the Governors of the Bank of England, who had furthermore paid £100,000 ($500,000) in order to have a sufficient number of committee members of the US Congress dealing with financial matters bribed. [122] This nefarious deed became known as the “Crime of 1873”

>>17866266
There followed a series of panics
or bank runs in 1873, 1884, 1890-1, 1893-4, 1897, 1903 and 1907.[124]
These bank runs so incensed President James
Abram Garfield that shortly after he took office on 4 March 1881, he
issued a statement in the middle of June of that year that he intended
to master the problem, when he said the following

“Whosoever controls the volume of money in any country is
absolute master of all industry and commerce... And when you
realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or
another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to
be told how periods of inflation and depression originate”.

Two weeks later Garfield was gunned down by “lone assassin”
Charles J. Guiteau

Guiteau (mentally unstable) claimed “that important men in Europe put him up to the task, and had
promised to protect him if he were caught”

>>17865839 (OP)
https://rumble.com/v3jj4nw-documentary-all-wars-are-bankers-wars.html

zionist occupied government borrows money from zionist owned central bank at interest, spends it on zionist causes, interests & wars, expects a dumbed down doped up population to feel obligated to pay for it all

just my $00.02 worth

I should’ve been more specific and asked if the book was right or not.

That these so called “noticers” are correct in that Jews are the ones responsible for ruining stuff.

I don’t want to be ignorant. But at the same time, hearing any antisemitism gets me upset. Am I wrong and just coping? Or am I right to be angry?

>Jews do what the king asks them to do

I thought monarchy was fucken based, BASED and trad and if you don't like it you're a commie?

>>17866405
Here's the ACTUAL problem
>jews lend out money to people over what they actually have
>king needs money for a war or something nobody cares about
>asks jews for money
>they don't have any
>in order to give the king money they have to call in their loans
>this means tons of people, especially the poor, lose all their money and possessions if they borrowed money from the jews
>these people hate the jews and blame them for murder, create blood libel
>it gets so bad the king is forced to kick out jews

>>17866465
>the poor
>taking out loans

Lol. Not in medieval Europe.

>>17866396
It's irrelevant and impossible to establish who first came up with a fraud 3000 years ago - all bankers of all nationalities have been in on it since then - at times. Nazi banks included. And Jewish banks make tiny minority in the current banking system anyway. Zhe Joos running it all is a pure stormfag imagination. When zhe Joos had too much money it was being stolen from them, that's it. Secret rulers my ass.
If you're interested in how banking works and in particular why exactly the current banking system is just an organized robbery you need Murray Rothbard's "The case against the FED"
https://mises.org/library/book/case-against-fed
He tells you HOW they are robbing you - only by knowing that you can resist being robbed by anybody else but a few Joos. National-socialists would have robbed you perfectly fine without this.

>>17866468
Yes the goldsmiths lent money to poor people and they were usually the people they took everything from

>>17866473
>goldsmiths
>interacting with poor people

Lol no.

>>17866470

Thanks man.

>>17866478
Usury was outlawed so people just did black market usury instead which allowed lenders to increase APRs to 20-30+%

>>17866490
So it wasn't the Jews, it was the gentile goldsmiths?

>>17866506
No it was jews. Naturally when something is outlawed in order to get it you pay a premium fee. This is how mafias work, and smugglers. Everybody willing to get you something illegal if they get to pocket more money than it's worth

Naturally during coin shortages or really any desperate situation the small landowner or indentured servant or whatever would go to a jew for money and get hit with a 50% APR

>>17866512
But I specifically wasn't outlawed for Jews to practise usury? That's how they made money for the king which is fucken based.

>>17866512
>small landowner or indentured servant
>ever setting food in a major city
>ever meeting a Jew in their entire lives

Protip: medieval banking isn't like the modern day where there's a little building with a desk and a clerk with leaflets about savings accounts and interest rates

>>17866532
>a jew would never live near a small landowner and give them an extortionate loan
that's a lot of assuming

>>17866891
>a small landowner in medieval Europe would frequently travel to the few large big cities with Jewish populations

You seem to be under the impression that medieval moneylending was some kind of 20th/21st century payday loan and the average Joe could just waddle in and ask for a loan.

>>17866900
wasn't every major city surrounded by farmland as far as the eye could see

>>17866974
Yeah things are next to other things, very astute. Tell me, what do you know of the feudal system?

>>17866982
So you're saying if it was a lord of a manor that went into town and got a loan and lost all his money it doesn't count because he was higher class?

>>17866985
actually isn't that exactly what they're describing? lords getting loans, defaulting, and then the french kings repossessing their ancestral land? which is why the magna carta was created?

>>17865839 (OP)
It looks like pretty generic conspiracy fare about the Jews. Nothing new, barely anything real, blood libel mentioned. Meh.
You'd think they would have found a copy of Yenkel's tavern by now or something. Bring up the Sacklers. But no.
You have to admit the "Oh we're just massive retarded fucking dupes, Moishe Ben Shlomo can just waltz in and take the shirt off my back while I drool staring at a wall" shtick is tops.
Aside from that I think the peasants did have valid reasons to hate the Jews and porgrom them. Then again the Jews also have valid reasons to hate the peasants too.

>>17866997
And the nobility was basically just playing both like retards. While also hating both.

>>17866992
>be french king
>take over england
>want their stuff
>bring your jewish pets
>lend the people whose land you want money at a fixed rate of 6-8% interest
>declare an emergency and call in all loans
>everybody defaults
>take their land

>>17866985
Yes, I'm saying the idea of evil Jews scheming to rip off the poor hard working peasant farmer struggling to feed his angelic looking kids is a nonsense and the only people who would ever interact with Jewish moneylenders would be merchants taking out the equivalent of a business loan, or rich boys wanting more ready cash to waste on stupid shit, or the king when it's time for him to be paid his share of the profits.

>>17867007
naturally you would offer people that don't have collateral higher interest rates, right? it's not unbelievable jews were extortionate given the nature of back alley dealings. Call a jew anything but don't call them financially moral

>>17867010
>it's not unbelievable

Translation: you're making shit up. You have zero idea how medieval society worked and it shows.

>>17867013
the source specifically says poor merchants, I would say those were lower class people than lords of a manor, right?

>>17867019
Wow you really do know nothing about medieval society, huh?

>>17867021
Hello? So if the poorest merchant gets a loan and the king hikes the interest rate up to 30% and he loses everything, that's okay?

>>17867006
And then you make up some poppycock about usury being blasphemy or whatever and take all the middlemen's property.

>>17867024
The "poorest merchant" is still the medieval equivalent of a Wall Street CEO anon.

>>17867026
Did you know that merchants were considered lower than peasants?

>>17867029
In medieval Europe? Are you having a giggle m8?

>>17867033
are you sure you're the one that has no idea what you're talking about?

>>17867035
You're claiming that merchants were lower than peasants in medieval Europe. You gonna have to source me that one.

>>17867037
It's pretty common across all cultures for merchants to be near untouchable class. they have to "buy" their prestige and very few make it

>>17867038
>no source
Not in medieval Europe. You genuinely don't know a single thing about it, do you?

>>17867041
Can you name a single merchant that wasn't bank-starting rich?

>>17867029
That's not the case though: Townsmen had well delineated and respected rights, weren't bound to the land like the serfs were, had a legal right to represent themselves. Merchants were well respected.
Jews were a class apart.

>>17867045
>still no source that merchants were lower than peasants in medieval Europe

Ok, you're gonna have to start with the basics. Perhaps one of those big hardback children's books or something. Or look up the word "guild" and go from there.

>>17867047
I'm sure guild merchants were respected, jews weren't allowed in guilds

>>17867052
And how, pray tell, does someone become a guild merchant?

>>17867047
Regardless, why are you trying to retconn medieval anti-semitism into being entirely about how Jews behaved. When the chief driver for it was their quality as Jews and thus as others; their rejection of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

>>17867055
Obviously we're not talking about guilds you retard, guilds were collapsing in the 16th century

>>17867052
That's my point, dumbass. Medieval jews != Regular merchants.

>>17867062
>>17867060

>>17867060
>starts yammering about merchants
>we're not talking about guilds

Ever post reveals how little you know about the topic...

>>17867068
>starts screaming that it's impossible a jew ever gave a poor landowner a loan
>starts screaming that there were no freelance merchants and everybody was in a guild
>during the century that guilds were collapsing
hmm, you're a dumbass

>>17867059
It will never not be hilarious that William of Newburgh, a noted antisemite, condemns the mob that attacked the Jews of York because they did it over money and not for self evident antisemitic reasons.

>>17867072
>there were no freelance merchants

Correct. This is why learning about the past is such fun and you find out cool little tidbits like how guilds would fuck you up if they caught you operating in their town without being a member.

>>17867077
Peddlers and hawkers: These were common figures, traveling with goods and selling them directly to consumers, particularly in rural areas or during fairs

Larger, more established merchants would also manage their businesses with their own capital and networks

Merchants employed peasants and artisans in rural areas for production, but these workers often operated independently within their own households, working for themselves while relying on merchants for raw materials and access to markets.

>>17867086
You..you think peddlers and hawkers were taking out loans from Jewish moneylenders?

>>17867089
There was a direct relationship between INDEPENDENT merchants and supplying peasants with jobs and extra income

I wonder what would happen if the king stole all their money

>>17867059
Like. Every single statement on the matter brings up Jesus meanwhile the modern anti-semite is out here trying to make it about interest rates because being a bible thumper is out of style. Just let it go at that point. Try to re-invent your anti-semitism in better terms than muh banks blood libel racial vendetta retardation.

>>17867090
There were no independent merchants. What part of this basic element of medieval society are you not understanding?

>>17867094
you're just blatantly lying

>>17867091
It's fun to watch them squirm when you point out that ALL usury is condemned. All of it. Yes, even your gramgrams savings account and pension fund. "N..no! It means EXCESSIVE interest!!!" is a pathetic cope to keep the comforts of modern life that are built entirely on usury.

>>17867096
You are blatantly ignorant of rudimentary elements of medieval society and that's been obvious this entire thread.

Peasants worked the land. The majority of them were bound to the land their lord owned out in the country, lived in a two room mud hut, considered owning an iron cauldron to be the height of luxury, rarely travelled further than the nearest county town on market days, would probably die within 20 miles of where they born and would never meet a Jew in their life.

Merchants belonged to guilds. They lived in towns and cities, had to be a guild member to operate a business in that town and had to have worked their way up through the ranks from apprentice, to journeyman to master before being allowed to open that business. The guild members who would have interactions with Jewish moneylenders were therefore already wealthy and powerful men.

>>17867110
dude this is a 5 year old's understanding of the 1600's. Guilds started collapsing in the 1500's and england was undergoing industrialization "the division of labor". you're actually retarded

>>17867115
>Jews
>1500s England

>>17867119
I'm convinced you're a jew that's mad at this thread so you're just saying random things

>>17867119
Shakespeare wrote about Jews in the English town of Venice

>>17867121
I'm convinced you know fuck all about medieval Europe, are randomly flailing from topic to topic (Merchants were lower than peasants? Hawkers and peddlers? 16th century England?) and this is another REEEE JEWS REEEE thread.

>>17867128
Okay lets hear the next hot take you read off the back of a cereal box or made up just now jewboy, I'm sure it's going to be really relevant

>>17867130
>REEEE JEWS REEEEE

Still waiting for that source that merchants were lower than peasants in medieval Europe.

>>17867133
I specifically made sure to not post any anti judaism and somehow this still outraged the jidf

>>17867134
>REEEEEE JEWS REEEEEE x2

Still no source that merchants were lower than peasants in medieval Europe.

>>17867135
I didn't post about jews in a negative way once in this thread, this is something you invented

now you being a jew is kind of your problem and I don't want to hear about it

>>17867136
>Reeeeeee Jews reeeeee X3

Still no source.

>>17867141
Source on what? you just lie about history because you don't like people even remotely talking about jewish history

>>17867142
>source on what

So you know noting about medieval Europe and can't remember things you were asked a few minutes ago? Are you genuinely retarded? A source that merchants were lower than peasants in medieval Europe.

>>17867144
So what part of Jews recalling loans in England and putting people out on the street are you okay with people talking about?

>>17867152
>STILL no source

>>17867158
Why do you not like people researching Jewish history and claim that it's anti Jewish?

>>17867160
>has posted no actual history whatsoever

What is your source that merchants were seen as lower than peasants in medieval Europe?

>>17867163
Why do you pretend to be an intellectual and just spam? Becoming emotional and crying while you lash out is anti semitic

>>17867165
We're done here. Enjoy your REEEEE JEWS REEEEEEE padded cell.

>>17867171
Okay bye shekelsteinburg

Isn't the problem they weren't informing people of the increased interest rates so they'd show up to pay their loan and end up owing 20% more on it forever arbitrarily?

... The peddler also trudges about from town to town and from city to city staggering under his burden. He is parched in the summer and frozen in the winter, and his eyes wither in their sockets before he gets sight of a coin. The farmers have wearied of these peddlers who stand before their doors daily. Still worse is the lot of the peddler who is faithful to his religion and refuses to defile himself with forbidden foods; he is bound to sink under his load. [Gartner, Jewish Immigrant, p. 59. It is related of three Russian immigrant brothers in Plymouth at the end of the nineteenth century that they went away peddling from Monday to Friday, taking loaves of bread and herring for their week's food.]

Two literary sources clearly indicate that the first Jews to settle in Devon in the early 1730's and in Cornwall about 1760 were, in the main, pedlars.

>>17867443
>Cecil Roth has suggested that the first Jew to settle in many a country town or village throughout England was a comparatively well-to-do merchant, [Roth, Provincial Jewry, p. 22.] and it is indeed reasonable to assume that the presence of such a man attracted Jewish pedlars to the neighbourhood as they could anticipate (lending them money) and help from their well-off co-religionist.
>at the bottom of the social ladder were Hawkers and Peddlers

>>17867447
>As late as 1955, the loan department of the London Jewish Welfare Board reported that "the high wages [being generally offered] do not seem to lessen the number of prospective borrowers who prefer to be their own masters, rather than take jobs which might make them more money."

>>17867447
How did the immigrant Jew without family or friends and who arrived with little or no capital get started? According to an account published early in the nineteenth century, he merely entered a synagogue, made his needs known to the worshippers who then made a quick collection for him and within a day or two of landing would direct him to the provinces with a peddling tray suspended from his neck filled with two or three pounds' worth of stock with which to start trading.

>>17867453
he would go to the provinces...then he would soon open a shop, in a poor part of the town, with an upper part for accommodation for his family, in a trade generally second hand clothing or furniture. He would travelled around the area, buying and selling, making and repairing, until he became established... If he was more ambitious he would soon learn that it was more profitable to buy and sell houses than bedroom suites. As he made his rounds, he would see an opportunity, buy a house, let it, and use the rent to pay the mortgage. After a year or two, he could repeat the process until he had several houses. After two or three decades, he would begin to develop property, buy land and build on it shops or offices or factories. Gradually, if they were wise, they would move away from the domestic market, the second generation might aspire to a profession, in law or medicine, or as ancillary to the business, in accountancy or estate management.

>Patrick Colquhoun was a Scottish merchant, statistician, magistrate, and founder of the first regular preventive police force in England, the Thames River Police. His work highlighting Jewish street traders in London, led to proposed legislation which would have identified all Ashkenazi Jews in England and created a board with the power to levy a tax on the Jewish community.

Never read it, and am NOT going to

>>17867469
>Fencing networks were often controlled by Jews, who were often perceived as specializing in shady financial dealings, and who often engaged in pawnbroking and ‘usury’ because of restrictions placed upon their employment by Christian host countries for many centuries. The major receiver for Randolph Branch’s gang of street robbers in the 1750s was Philip Abraham, who was known as Scampy the Jew.

>>17867489
Though the Royal Family was predominantly Irish, it was linked to a Jewish fencing gang in Spitalfield. Moses Holloway and Samuel Cobb were central figures in the Spitalfields gang. Most of the members of that Jewish gang were tried in February 1747: Cobb, Holloway and Richard Bunney stole 200 buckles and other silver and metal goods such as seals and corkscrews (by blowing out the candle in a shop one evening and making off with an entire showcase before the proprietor re-lit the candle), which they then passed to Moses Newnez Cordoso, Manasseh Alexander and Abraham Jacobs, who were tried for receiving stolen goods.

>>17867502
in Dukes Place, where there were two Jewish Synagogues and where many Jews resided. He was ‘bred to merchandizing, for which the Jews have a natural genius’, but became involved with the gang. He confessed to several robberies, and turned King’s evidence against other Jewish colleagues. Samuel Moses, age 35, born in West Friesland, confessed to a life of pickpocketing, thieving, robbing and housebreaking. He had travelled throughout the United Provinces, Flanders, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and could speak the languages of all these countries. According to James Guthrie, the Ordinary of Newgate, ‘He was the father and counsellor of a set of vile young rogues of [the Jewish] nation, whom he led on to the stealing plate, rings, and other valuable goods, and breaking goldsmiths or jewellers shops, and stealing such like things out of gentlemen’s houses in the country, wheresoever they could possibly find any opportunity.’ Moses confessed not only to the robbery for which he was convicted, but to many others, in association with Michael Jude and Solomon Athorn.