>>17868932
James Fannin’s performance during the Texas Revolution could have been improved and avoided, notably by adhering more promptly and decisively to orders, enhancing communication, and making clearer strategic decisions for dumbest West Point graduates:
>Timely Retreat from Goliad:
Despite receiving General Sam Houston’s order on March 11, 1836, to retreat from Goliad and join forces in Victoria, Fannin delayed until March 19 to commence retreat. This hesitation and not using the fog, allowed General Urrea’s Mexican forces to catch and surround his troops at Coleto Creek, leading to their surrender. A prompt withdrawal would have greatly increased survival chances and preserved Texian fighting strengthened morale boots as well honored confident.
>Improved Communication:
Fannin’s difficulties in maintaining coordination with allied forces, including delays and intercepted dispatches, weakened his operational effectiveness. Better communication with Sam Houston and subordinate commanders (e.g., those sent to Refugio) might have enabled more cohesive movement and avoidance of entrapment.
>Decisive Leadership at Coleto Creek:
Once engaged by the Mexican army, Fannin formed a defensive square but surrendered the next day. More resolute defense or a strategic breakout attempt might have changed the battle’s outcome. Conversely, had he understood the precariousness of his position earlier, accepting surrender terms more cautiously or negotiating could have reduced losses.
