>mfw Posth et al., 2019's best model for Imperial period Romans from central Italy is 69.4% Late Bronze Age Israel + 30.6% Central Italy Etruscan
What the fuck happened, /his/isters? Is this why they were so ready to adopt Christianity?

>>17866949 (OP)
Correction: Posth et al., 2021

The cope is Anatolians but Anatolians are nothing like the ancestry influx seen in Imperial Rome

>>17866967
Anatolians are more explainable for Greece and Balkans, right? Pic related is for Italy.

>>17866980
Etruscan is forced in the rotations and the top 2 models with almost entirely Crete or Sicily BA are even better with lower SEs and better p. Overfit cope

>no they're Anatolians
>no they're steppe Etruscans
>no they're Spaniards
>no they're Germano-Celts
>no they're Levantines

This is why you suffer when using admixtures.

>>17867399
>forced in the rotations
That's the whole point of admixtures numbskull.