>>17872821>>17869772>>17869895>>17871434Cont:
Sources:
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805201/
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1033639/
- researchgate.net/publication/22064112_Empirical_Aztec_Medicine
- "Precious Beauty: The Aesthetic and Economic Value of Aztec Gardens" , and other stuff by Susan Toby Evans,
- The Badianus manuscript, full color scans here: mediateca.inah.gob.mx/repositorio/islandora/object/codice:851, a english translated and annotated one is "An Aztec Herbal: The Classic Codex of 1552", you can find older versions of that published in like the 1910s to 30s for free under slightly different titles
- Florentine Codex, especially Book 10 and 11 but also others: florentinecodex.getty.edu
- muse.jhu.edu/pub/263/oa_monograph/chapter/2252724
- Cortes's Letters, Bernal Diaz's account, etc
- Encyclopedia of American Indian Contributions to the Worlds
Something I didn't mention is also that Cortes, Motolinรญa, and even Francisco Hernandez, Philip II's personal royal court physician and naturalist who litterally traveled to Mexico to document their botanical and medical practices, all talked about Aztec medicine and doctors being superior to Spain's
Various other Conquistadors, friars, and court officials all praise the Aztec and other Mesoamericans as being proper high cultures and sophisticated civilizations, and while I'm not really interested in debating which 500 year old militaristic society has the moral high ground (it's a stupid question and anybody who thinks there's an actual answer is stupid), plenty of them criticize Spanish actions and recgonigized that at least situationally aspects of Spanish conquest and colonialism wasn't just
This is just a small sample of quotes, moreso selecting for ones talking about recognizing that the Mesoamericans valued intellectualism and produced high art: >>>/v/716322542 >>>/v/716324741 >>>/v/716325865 >>>/v/716326547 >>>/v/716327371 >>>/v/716328771 >>>/v/716329637 >>>/v/716330829
2/2 probably