>>17869955Irving is not a Hitler apologist lmao.
>its virtually impossible to denythe evidence simply isnt there.
Also who cares about David Irving? He is a ghost of holocaust revisionism that people bring up more often to slander historical inquiry rather than a citation.
We have motivation:
1 jews were a problem people, much like they are today, and they needed to be isolated from the general population.
2 jews were overrepresented among partisans, this is from Data we have from the Red Army, the Free French, and Betar, an avowed zionist paramilitary claiming 300,000 active members by 1936 alone, this number includes traditional "civilians" such as women, children, and the elderly.
We have a mechanism, mass starvation, disease, and a literal war being fought over the land where jews were concentrated, we have well documented mass exodii of jews from ports in Romania, Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Greece out of Europe and into Turkey or the Levant directly.
and we have explanatory and predictive power, -what would we expect to see given all of these circumstances? -
mass casualties, which is what we see, as well as mass hysteria (stories of gas chambers, eagle pits, rollercoasters, nuclear testing) which is also what we see.
We have motivation, mechanism, and predicted conclusions.
Why should we NOT apply occams razor? Why SHOULD we accept special pleading?