Hundreds of millions of dead people were sure Jesus was going to return in their lifetimes.

>>17868832 (OP)
2000 years of "any day now" copium is the ultimate grift.

imagine running the same "soon-TM" scam since the Roman Empire. Every doomsday cult fails, yet the goalposts keep moving: "spiritual return", "already here in your heart", LMAO

Most successful LARP in history, paypig normies still donating.

Remember that this has its own page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfulfilled_Christian_religious_predictions

State authority on your imagination. State government controlling your reality. With stories of magic lava to cow you, they use whatever FUD they can get their hands on to make you a line item when required, the only spiritual war is between the ruled and those ruling. Technology isn't for making your life easier it's for making it easier to stifle political power in lower classes. Jesus affected a handful of generations before it was transformed wildly by political/cultural interests. The ultimate slavery system, reformed by slavers.

>>17868841
Remember that you should go back to r/atheism

>>17869615
So why hasn't Jesus come yet despite millions of people believing he would come within their lifetimes because of le endtimes prophecy?

>>17869637
Because peoples' beliefs about it aren't relevant to when he comes back. You aren't even capable of basic reasoning, it seems. You should kill yourself. :)

>>17868832 (OP)
>>17868841
Obviously the return of Christ is something that occurs within an individual. It's clearly mystical. Churchianity and atheists are wrong.

>>17868832 (OP)
Maybe christ's return were the friends we made along the way

>>17869684
>Obviously
>clearly
I don't think you know what these words mean since it isn't obvious nor clear

>>17868832 (OP)
Am amazed at anon that can't find Jesus

Is in your heart waiting for you

>>17868832 (OP)
2 moar wix

>>17868832 (OP)
>>17868838
>>17869637
And Jesus Christ did return, his "coming" being the destruction of the Second Temple, see picrel.

One could even settle this "failed prophet" canard definitively in the light of a different canard skeptics never tire of repeating: that the accuracy of the Olivet Discourse in foretelling the destruction of the Second Temple proves that the Gospels were at least written after 70 A.D., since such an accurate prediction would be improbable. Well, the skeptic can't have his cake and eat it.

If the Gospels were written after 70 A.D. then it is absolutely absurd to also maintain that the early Christians would fabricate a prophecy in order to make their leader look like a genius on a relatively minor prophecy about a building being destroyed and yet a total lunatic on the most relevant aspect of the same prophecy, namely, the approaching end of the world, since the world very obviously didn't end in 70 A.D. Either the Christians fabricated an absurd prophecy to falsify their leader right out of the gate, or these passages are being misread.

You need a new argument to spam.