>>17870988 (OP)>>17871124He was the Russian Carter, jovial and well meaning, but not the tough principled realist they needed at the time.
>Gave his people prosperityThe transition to free markets was a good thing, but it was almost inevitable at this point and he completely fucked up the process. The Russian mafia and corruption exploded, functionaries were routinely killed for not accepting bribes and selling state property for pittance to this or that upcoming oligarch, most of whom were Jews. The educated middle class fled the country. Child prostitutes lined the streets just like Weimar Germany and these grew up to be alcoholics and krokodil addicts and continue the cycle, assuming they have children because Russia doesn't even get the high birthrates that come with poverty.
Now Russia has the worst of both worlds, the terror and totalitarianism of the Soviet Union and the degeneracy and corruption of the liberal capitalists. /pol/ came to believe his successor was based, trad and opposed to "globohomo" because of his antigay stance, but in reality it exists solely to appease muslims, it is an example of him placing the will of muslims above those of white russians. Not that the will of white leftist degenerates is a good thing, just saying.
Russia needed a "war leader", a crisis leader, a Bismarck, an FDR, a Thatcher, instead they got a pushover.