Thread 17871041 - /his/

Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:20:18 PM No.17871041
Screenshot 2025-07-25 111855
Screenshot 2025-07-25 111855
md5: df2c83fc5e308ed3565f7e89f1341c4f🔍
Where does myth of "Romans were white" myth come from? All ancient literature says the opposite. Romans were olive skinned while the pale skin Germanics were living in huts and shitting outside
Replies: >>17871056 >>17871222 >>17871228 >>17871233 >>17871251 >>17872502 >>17872601 >>17872609 >>17873266
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:25:59 PM No.17871056
>>17871041 (OP)
>Where does the myth that Romans were swarthy meds come from?
It a purely modern creation, meant to disinherit whites, to steal their history and lands. The dark skinned have no historical claim anywhere or to anything unless they can convince whites to relinquish their rightful dominions.
Replies: >>17871087
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:37:44 PM No.17871087
>>17871056
>It a purely modern creation, meant to disinherit whites, to steal their history and lands.


why is /his/ full of /pol/ tards now? I am talking about writings of Tacitus, Pliny the Elder and Vitruvius and this clown comes along and posts from schizo pol ramblings
Replies: >>17871171
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:16:15 PM No.17871171
>>17871087
>we wuz kangs
Nobody is buying it, brownoid.
Replies: >>17871197
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:25:40 PM No.17871197
>>17871171
>Nobody is buying it, brownoid.

first off i am not brown. Can the porn addicted mods do something about the low IQ /pol/ posters here?
Replies: >>17871200
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:28:10 PM No.17871200
>>17871197
They should delete your low quality race bait thread and ban you for it.
Replies: >>17871202
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:29:58 PM No.17871202
>>17871200
>They should delete your low quality race bait thread and ban you for it.

i am posting about physical appearances of ancient Roman, you are a pol tard seething about whites or some shit
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:37:48 PM No.17871222
>>17871041 (OP)
Romans were mostly based in the mediterranean, with south europe and the south of central europe, plus middle east and north africa.

Mostly olive skinned, they were an admisture of many people, ironically united under same ideal laws and language, while the mono racial tribes of the north were often divided and fighting among each other were also more white given less sun means less demand for melanin to avoid a cancer, due to geographical pressure.

But for today's standards it counts as "south european" type of white if you will, the same "white" as Aristotle, Arquimedes, Alexander Magnum, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, Trajan, Leonidas, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Euclides, etc.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:39:13 PM No.17871228
AKG1827015
AKG1827015
md5: 1bedcb95a13b828535e5b0017c47277b🔍
>>17871041 (OP)
Wignats have a racist supremacist ideology and they can't deal with the fact they were civilized and taken out of their mudhuts by non-white pepo (since they consider white only northern Europeans), so that cognitive dissonance in the face of actual history creates their delusional coping with nordicist myths.

What's funny is that Rome's civilization was just a continuation of Greek civilization and Greek civilization wasn't born in a vacuum either, it was influenced greatly by Egyptian and Phoenician civilizations, which were from North Africa and the Levant, so even browner and even semitic in the case of the phoenicians
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:41:02 PM No.17871233
>>17871041 (OP)
>Seutonius
He's literally saying Augustus and Nero were white lol
>Tacitus
Look, if a Frenchman points out that Norwegians are usually tall and blonde does that mean he's saying that the French are actually brown? (ok maybe today they but you get my point...)
>Pliny and Vitruvius
Not sure how that's relevant really.
Replies: >>17871246 >>17872467
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:45:20 PM No.17871246
>>17871233
Because modern term of "white" is an amalgamation of terminology British used to distinguish themselves and subjugated people under Imperial policy (hence Irish people were officially considered as non white, for example) and a group of Nordicists who only see as "white" nordic people.

Which is all fun and games when you see that such type of "white" means missing out on at least 1700s worth of history, literature, architecture and that time to shine only starts with Industrial Revolution, and that the best military conquereros don't apply either.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 6:47:40 PM No.17871251
>>17871041 (OP)
Romanians are gypsies we know. Now find a job.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:01:10 AM No.17872467
>>17871233
>if a Frenchman points out that Norwegians are usually tall and blonde does that mean he's saying that the French are actually brown?
So, despite French and Norwegians exhibiting statistically significant differentiation in terms of physical appearance, they are both considered white. If this is the case, why is it invalid to say that Romans were white and different from Central and Northern Europeans at the same time? Why are "Mediterranean" and "white" seen as mutually exclusive categories? In my opinion, they are not
Replies: >>17872480
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:06:06 AM No.17872480
>>17872467
they aren't mutually exclusive and only retards think they are.
Also there were literal Germanic Roman emperors/military commanders in the late empire (Stilicho, Silvanus, and Magnentius for instance. Even Theodosius II was half Frankish.) but I guess Nordicist wewuzzers would rather make shit up about the early empire because that's more prestigious and well known.
Replies: >>17872498
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:10:31 AM No.17872498
>>17872480
That is true, many (maybe even most?) high-ranking officials and even emperors were not ethnically Italic after Augustus. It is unfortunate that historical discussion often revolves around theories that are based on false premises (Romans are either Nordic or Arab and such nonsense)
Replies: >>17872584
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:13:00 AM No.17872502
>>17871041 (OP)
It's called "Wewuzzing".
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:45:40 AM No.17872584
>>17872498
>high-ranking officials and even emperors were not ethnically Italic after Augustus.
I can't speak for the principate but in Late Antiquity, starting around the mid third century, most Emperors and military commanders were from the frontier provinces while the highest ranking members of the civil administration were often still of italian origin. The majority of governors though would have been provincials, and probably most of the senatorial class as well.
I don't really get why so many people think this is some terrible evil thing though, Caracalla who was from north africa and gets a lot of hate wasn't a great ruler but he was hardly "decadent" either given how he was basically a stereotypical soldiering manly man by roman standards, even his nickname Caracalla comes from the name of the cloak worn by a common legionary. If anything it should be seen as a sign of how strong Roman culture and civilisation was that it could meaningfully unite someone born in North Africa and someone like Valentinian the Great, a pannonian born provincial who was ironically described as having the appearance of a barbarian by Ammianus Marcellinus iirc, under a shared identity and cause.
No universal roman citizenship means no Claudius Gothicus, no Aurelian, no Probus, no Diocletian, no Constantine, no Stilicho, no Aetius, or any other of these Roman heroes whose ancestors had once been barbarians but who themselves fought for the Roman People as hard as someone who's ancestors had been among Romulus' original followers. Even Ammianus Marcellinus, perhaps the greatest Latin historian after Tacitus, was born in Syria.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:51:53 AM No.17872601
>>17871041 (OP)
You just posted evidence to the contrary
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:53:01 AM No.17872609
>>17871041 (OP)
>myth
the only fiction here is any insistence that they weren't white. such bullshit on this board, never ending amounts of it.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 12:30:56 PM No.17873266
>>17871041 (OP)
Ragebaiter OP can't even comprehend his own image