>italians are untrustworthy! They changed sized in ww2
>treaty of london? Never heard of it

>damn these eyetalian butchers, gassing muh ethiopians!
>it doesnt matter that we oppressed africa as well, it happened 20 years prior so we have the moral high ground!
I know history is written from the victors, but the level of hypocrisy shown by anglos is simply staggering.

>>17871479 (OP)
Crying 'hypocrisy' is weaksauce. Everyone was a backstabbing colonizer... Anglos, Italians, all of them.

It is true, the brother wars were pointless. Not going to lie or deny it.

>>17871484
italy went to war, and hundreds of italians died. all of this for nothing. why? because treaties are inks on a page. woodrow wilson interfered with the treaty and effectively annulled it, and france and UK were more than happy to play dumb and allow the USA to do so, because they feared italy's influence would extend to the danube. basically they realized they offered italy too much and backed on their words, like the vermin they are.

>>17871494
typo, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. italy's casualties in ww1 amount to about 1 million, civvies and military combined.

>>17871494
>they feared italy's influence would extend to the danube.
sounds like a giant pipe dream, italy got raped hard by greece during ww2 so there's zero chance they would have romelarped over a big chunk of the balkans

>>17871524
>sounds like a giant pipe dream
but it ain't. go check it yourself.
> italy got raped hard by greece during ww2
and italy raped turkey hard, and italy occupied ethiopia in 7 months, and italy annexted albania in less than a week. your point being? greece failed because there was no planning, it was literally decided overnight. i'm sure you're familiar with stuff like this, like the british losing against zulus or americans against afghan goatfuckers.

>I know history is written from the victors, but the level of hypocrisy shown by anglos is simply staggering.
Okay, here's the actual history then.
>hey Anglo, I know I didn't do anything in the war, but you promised me the territory, which is now occupied by new allies of yours, who declared their independence before I got to them and did more than I ever did in the war
>so could you please betray your own allies like I betrayed mine and give me free stuff, even though I didn't fight for it and thus don't deserve it?

>>17871494
The fuck are you even talking about?
Italy got most of the territory promised, with the exception of Albanian protectorate and the territory around Zara

>>17872125
>today, in things that never happened

Today the English and Italians are actually on pretty good terms with each other, considering they're both crazy about football

>>17872342
>considering they're both crazy about football

Or maybe it's because there's nothing to fight over. The EU/NATO has essentially placed everyone on the same team

>>17872135
italy only got one thing, and that's istria. italy never received dalmatia, fiume became an indipendent state, didn't get turkey and half of the balcans. you can clearly see them on the map.

>>17872125
>hey Anglo, I know I didn't do anything in the war
entering ww1 one year late is called doing nothing now? a million dead italians are not enough for you?
>rest of the blog
pure spite filled fantasy

>>17872342
italy and britain were in very good terms before ww1. that's mainly because half of the military aristocracy of both the two nations had blood bonds and were intertwined by centuries of arranged marriages.

>>17872476
Italy got Trieste, Trentino and South Tyrol nigga

>>17872751
Those were conquered by force of arms, tardo. They were the main fronts of ww1. Meanwhile italian troops never set foot in anatolia or serbia, but they were promised nonetheless.

>>17873153
So what you actually dumb shit, conquering a place per se was not automatic reason for annexion, Italy got these territories because it was stipulated it'd have gotten them
>Serbia and Anatolia were promised
IQ -50

>>17873194
you can look at the terms of the treaty yourself you fucking nigger, and see if i'm wrong or right

>>17873202
The treaty included annexing those areas you stupid fucking faggot, which is why other areas which the the italian army did reach & occupy such as Innsbruck and parts of North Tyrol weren't annexed since it wasn't what was agreed upon

>>17871494
> italy went to war, and hundreds of italians died. all of this for nothing.
Italians literally betrayed Germans and Austrians. They aren't ones to complain about 'treaties'.

>>17873537
Germans violated Belgium's neutrality, Austrians planned to attack Italy during both the aftermath of the Messina earthquake and the Italo-Turkish war, they aren't ones to complain about "treaties" either

>>17873537
von hoetzendorf already planned the invasion of italy already in 1908. he was absolutely foaming at the thought of invading italy, to the point where franz joseph demoted him for being a psychopatic warmonger.

>>17871491
True. At the end of the day Angolems must be liberate too, we must work with them. They are our White brothers
yeah we break some balls here but it’s an honor to be surrounded by Aryans, and not degenerate, coin clipping, satan worshipping, juden like what infiltrated my country; they should fucking die!

>>17873537
it was asquith's fault the treaty was created in the first place. it was the english who lured the italians away from the central powers with the promise of historically italian lands. a promise that was very enticing, since everyone and their mothers hated austrians in italy. the blame sits suqarely on the english, and later on woodrow wilson personally.