https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin-eater

The Welsh circumvented eternal damnation by simply doing what Jesus did and absorbing the sins of others.

Catholics seething!

Bring back sin eating!

>>17872253 (OP)
>what Jesus did and absorbing the sins of others.
Lol no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvGs2wg4Tbg

>>17872262
>I take your sins

This is what sin eaters do, that is what Jesus did. It's also what the Jewish chicken does when they cut it's head off.

Catholics call it pagan heresy because it's it breaks their power complex

>>17872265
>>I take your sins
Christ didn't "take your sins". He's sinless, that's the entire point.

>>17872301
A sinless guy did some sin eating is what you're telling me

The act of sin eating is not restricted to humans

>>17872307
He didn't eat any sins.

>>17872314
Then why did they go away? Cleanse, eat, all the same shit. Sins were removed. The Catholics didn't anticipate this. They think there can be a monopoly on this.

>>17872326
>Then why did they go away?
They didn't.
>Sins were removed.
Lol no they weren't, they were forgiven, but that doesn't mean we're not sinful.

>>17872253 (OP)
You can not transfer sin through canibalism, that is the same reason why it is pointless for the uncalled to say they claim a place in the kingdom through flesh and blood consumption. the spirit is non transferable.

>>17872337
>Forgiven, cleansed, eaten

Stop moving goal posts. The entrance to heaven is enabled.

>>17872341
It is transferred via bread and salt on the person that is unable to confess via traditional means. Sometimes this is because they've been excommunicated.

>>17872347
>It is transferred
it is not transferable. There is repentance and judgement, and in Christ the spirit is made holy in unification with the Father's will.

>>17872357
Says who? You confess to a priest right?

>>17872359
Repentant confession of sins if purification and the return to righteousness. The requirement of a dedicated agent is a dubious addition, although not uninspired.

>>17872347
Forgiven is not the same as sin being erased.
>The entrance to heaven is enabled.
You weird "sin eating" ritual sure as fuck doesn't.

>>17872368
They're doing that though, just differently. Sorry bud.

>>17872357
Jesus is literally Christian chicken kapparot lol

>>17872370
Priests eat sins with their ears in the confession booth

>>17872359
Repentant confession of sins is purification and the return to righteousness. The requirement of a dedicated agent is a dubious addition, although not uninspired.
>>17872375
non transferable

>>17872376
Some say it's turtles all the way down

But really, it's scapegoats all the way down.

>>17872379
I think you're confused. A person repents their sins, but perhaps their body is no longer functioning or they've been cast out by the church. Guess what? A nice fella says, it's cool, I got you homie. And that fella feels ease in his last moments. His soul rests. Sin eating is no different than any other process to heaven.

Seethe.

>>17872376
The mechanism of salvation is of a different sort, it is not a transfer of sin but the turning of a thing to a redeemed cause.

>>17872378
lol no.

>>17872391
Mad

>>17872389
Biblically incorrect

>He was broken for your iniquities
>Why have you forsaken me

It has always been a sin sacrifice even during from the temple era to yeshua

>>17872388
Souls. Giving any those was a mistake... we used to keep track of them, assign them, tend to them, and it was an honor to take a place in the kingdom with one. But now that word has gained a new and nonsensical meaning in this age.

Now why does the catholic church tolerate that south/central american folk bullshit

>>17872398
inequities, yes the blood is upon him for the unrighteous. it contradicts not what I have told you.

>>17872406
I'll eat your sins for you bb

>>17872411
>he was a scapegoat killing sacrifice for your sins
>still not a son sacrifice though

Brain damage. It's already stated he was the sacrifice to end temple sacrifices

You don't know your own theology

>>17872420
No further such sacrifices are required for atonement as the redemption made possible in Christ is now viable. How gracious of God to have made us a part of himself, what a sacrifice.

>>17872459
Then we don't need priests

>>17872473
Need? no, not strictly, but there is something to be said for recognizing the gifts and having people take up roles playing into them.

>>17872478
sin-eating is a tool specific for holes in catholic pathways to heaven

>>17872483
>pathways to heaven
You will find nobody remembers anymore where the border was and the gate hasn't been manned in a very, very long time. Heaven isn't so glorious anymore, mostly in shambles really, coasting along on the glory of bygone ages.

>>17872492
you're gay

>>17872496
Oh, if you want to see it just walk the path. But once your eyes are open, you won't like all that you find.

>>17872505
gayest way to lose an argument bud

>>17872507
Nobody said the truth would be easy, in fact you will probably wish you kept believing in your fairy tales about an afterlife. The reality of spiritual things are far more horrifying and glorious than whatever nonsense is peddled by so called knowers these days.

>>17872535
not an argument

>>17872538
Well, there is the light at the end of the tunnel to look forward to. The next resurrection of the body of God is going to be carried out by his people when they have no other recourse for to save themselves from death, when they have no other path for salvation against the world which has always wanted to destroy them. Then the glorification of heavenly kingdom can resume again, its people once more aware of themselves and unblinded.

>>17872550
God thinks it's pretty nice that humans are willing to take on the sins of others so that they may enter heaven, after the church has turned their back on them. God is cool with it.

>>17872557
You can not transfer sin through canibalism, that is the same reason why it is pointless for the uncalled to say they claim a place in the kingdom through flesh and blood consumption. the spirit is non transferable.

>>17872565
You aren't eating a body anon

>>17872262
Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world"

Sin-eating as a practice is never actually directly attested in any primary source, it's always "I heard they did this" or "the local vicar tried to stop them doing this" or "they used to do this but not anymore". It was probably made up by John Aubrey in the 17th century, and he seems to have got it by misunderstanding the concept of a funeral dole.