Did this phenotype exist in antiquity? Or did he just spawn in the past 15 years or so?

why only focus on the white ones?

>>17889209
Because its impossible to be an incel in non white cultures

>>17889190 (OP)

It has always existed, because ytbois are permaclitty incels.

the term "incel" originated in the early 90s I think

>>17889190 (OP)
No, the chud phenotype is mostly a result of lack of sun exposure, physical exercise and bad diet consisting mostly of processed slop

>>17889190 (OP)
I look like this

>>17889237
I confirm, in the Latinx country where I live, everyone is ugly. And incels are nonexistent. When I went to Europe, I was surprised by the number of attractive women and men (no homo) I saw. That is why countries with subhuman people like Africa or India have high birth rates.

>>17889190 (OP)
Himmler

>>17889190 (OP)
Why do people who live on the internet have an obsession with assigning typologies to things?

>>17889190 (OP)
>low facial masculinity
that's me
>nasolabial folds and receding hairline
me again
>pale skin, lack of underlying reddish hue indicating low test
exactly me... I didn't know that it was due to low test

>>17889589
Trying to make sense of their worldview by collecting info and playing with it like legos until it feels right.

>>17889190 (OP)
just lift some weights bro

>>17889209
Kek! Different race, but it's exactly the same phenotype.

>did ugly people wear glasses in antiquity
no

>>17889237
>Because its impossible to be an incel in non white cultures
I mean I guess the Muslims just fuck men and boys instead...

I am betting 75% of these are normal dudes who just happen to look like this but troons associate them with chuds because they have no better counterattacks to being mocked at for being the clowns they are.

>>17891131
it's a random assortment of ugly dudes. I think the original collage they made like 25% of them were jews

>>17891131
>trannies out of nowhere
Na that's definitely you in OP.

>>17889190 (OP)
>lacks reddish hue
>half of the faces in the picture are reddish
???

>17891151
You can't talk about bread without talking about ham.
You do not blend in. Go back. ;)
Also yes, I'm hungry, I will go grab a sandwich.

>>17889190 (OP)