How would you rank the BIG3 - Ceasar, Alexander and Napoleon in terms of greatness?

>>17908753 (OP)
Alexander mogs

>>17908753 (OP)
Motherfuck the big three
Nigga, it's just big me

>implying Napoleon is even close to being on their level

>>17908878
Napoleon was more impressive than Alexander. Alexander was a nepobaby who inherited his army and kingdom. Napoleon built everything himself from the ashes of his failed state.

Napoleon is S, Alexander and Caesar are F--.

Napoleon was a Christian, and Alexander and Caesar were paganfaggots who killed people for demons.

Napoleon > Caesar > Alexander

Alexander > Caesar >>> Antichrist Napoleon

>>17908917

>>17908753 (OP)
I will admit I don't know much of Alexander's campaigns, but what exactly makes him stand out from the rest? At a glance he didn't seem to overcome such great odds as the other two. Sure he had some impresive battles, and his tactical skill is undeniable, but he only faced 1 real enemy (the persian empire) and after two major battles the empire totally collapsed giving him free reign to campaign around without any resistance. So what is it that makes Alexander special, other than his quasi-heroic life story, seemingly having more literary value than military substance

Caesar > Napolean > POWER GAP > Alexander

Alexander the nepobaby inherited his father’s hard work and ran it into the ground, if he was half the man Caesar was he would had wiped Parthia from the map and the Indians would be speaking Koine Greek today

Caesar > Alexander > Napoleon

>>17908917
How the fuck you expect people that are born earlier than Christ to be Christian?

>>17908760
>daddys army
>empire gets divided and destroyed after his death
lmao

Ceaser was both incredible politcal player and amazing general.

Napoleon was good adminstrator and amazing general, was horrible at international politics.

Alex good general dont really have much else to him


C>N>A

Ranking by strictly their military accomplishments:
Alexander > Napoleon > Caesar
Alexander for completely destroying the strongest military power in the ancient world at the time. Napoleon had a spottier military record but his performance in the 2nd-5th coalition wars is genuinely impressive. Caesar was a good commander but was by no means undefeated and often won due to blind luck. If we're ranking by politcal savvy though it's Caesar > Alexander > Power Gap > Napoleon.

Military speaking, Napoleon is superior as his doctrine and tactic was far ahead of his time and changed for ever the way war is waged.
Alexander's father was actually the tactical innovator, he just applied it with success.
Caesar was smart and made outstanding manoeuvers but in the end, his army fought the same way every roman army did.
Politicaly speaking, that's not the same.
Napoleon was a shitty diplomat and that cost him his empire. But his legacy remained even after his defeat and shaped europe forever.
Alexander did good politically and managed to rule his empire pretty well, but his succession was a mess. And beside creating new kingdoms and dynasties, his political legacy was rather weak overall.
Caesar was a really good politician. He paved the way for Octavius and his legacy is probably the strongest of all, up to this day.
So in conclusion and based on both political and military merit, I would say Caesar>Napoleon>Alexander

>>17909723
Napoleon faced and defeated the strongest military powers of his time, at the same time, multiple time.

>>17908878
I like Bony well but that is just silly.

>>17909639
Well you've summed up all relevant to that, he was a great general that defeated anything coming up against him. But yeah in simply basic terms is just a glorified general based in eurocentrism

>>17909831
>eurocentrism
Why are browns unable to create history?

>>17908753 (OP)
Philip and Alexander brought stability to the region at the Battle of Chaeronea. Caesar wept in front of a statue of Alexander. Pompey was said to resemble Alexander.

Alexander
Caesar
Napoleon

>>17908753 (OP)
Nappy B is easily the best. Julie C is a close second. Allie G is my favorite, but a distant third.

Napoleon is first. The last great empire-builder of the pre-modern era.

>>17909684

Caesar was born in 34 AD and Alexander in 91.

Alexander's only merit was that he was charismatic
Napoleon and Caesar were legitimate geniuses and made it on their own
Out of the bunch Napoleon achieved the most, I think

>>17910645

Bullshit. It's impossible for a polytheist to be a genius.

Shouldn't Genghis Khan be up there?

>>17910659

You mean the paganfaggot who raped his own daughter then sacrificed her to the sun "god", Tengri?

>>17908753 (OP)
The big three are the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost
And they are all great

>>17910796

Based.

>>17910659
It's european BIG3.

>>17910294
Again, your bits aren't funny.

>>17911147

NOT A BIT, YOU RETARD.

>>17908753 (OP)
Nappy, Caesar, Alexander

Nappy won against equivalent forces repeatedly and overwhelmingly. Caesar was good at what he did but he admits that most of that was luck. Alexander was a great tactician but his strategic and legal mind was lacking compared to the other two.

>>17911148
>Tripfag Christcuck calling anyone retarded
Pot, meet kettle

>>17911148
this you?

>>17908753 (OP)
Napoleon > Caesar > Alexander

>>17911212

Is this Hellfag?

>>17911207

>TRIPCODE BAD WAHHH

>CHRIST BAD WAHH

>WAHHH