>Now kill all the little boys, and kill all the women that have had sex with men! But all the little girls, the ones that are virgins, keep alive for yourselves

What the fuck is this freak's problem?

That's just the dehumanizing logic of total war.

>>17911675 (OP)
Why do think you Christians support Israel unconditionally? They love child murder.

>>17911675 (OP)
What translation is that?

>>17911875
In the KJV it says "woman children" instead of "little girls". Explain how that makes the meaning different.

>>17911880
Just tell me the translation because it sounds very perverted. The original meaning of the verse is shrouded in the vulgar language.

>>17911675 (OP)
God will burn coals in your head in the day of judgement

>>17911883
What's the original meaning of the verse? Here's the KJV and it still says the Israelites are taking the virgin girls to do... what with, exactly?

>>17911896
>>17911883
Here's the original Hebrew

>>17911896
The original meaning of the verse is that the girls will be spared from death, which is merciful. Look, I'll even use the Hebrew to show you the original meaning of the text. I will break it down into the basic words and you can translate it yourself.
וְעַתָּה, הִרְגוּ כָל-זָכָר בַּטָּף; וְכָל-אִשָּׁה, יֹדַעַת אִישׁ לְמִשְׁכַּב זָכָר--הֲרֹגוּ.
>V’ata hirgu kol zakhar bataf, vekol isha yoda’at ish lemishkav zakhar – harogu.
And–you–kill–all–male–among the little ones–and–all–women–knowing–man–for–lying–bed–man–kill
>Vekhol hattaf banashim, asher lo–yad‘u mishkav zakhar – hakhayu lakhem.
And–all–children–of the women–who–no–knew–bed–man–spare–for yourselves
The word is spare, not keep in some sexual perverted sense. The girls were being saved.

>>17911915
Why was it important that they be virgins?

>>17911922
It would be cruel to kill a woman's husband and then bring her into the tribe. The emotional bond that is formed during sex is immensely powerful. The little girls never had that, so the Israelites were being merciful.

>>17911926
>The little girls never had that
>the little girls didn't have emotional attachment to their (now dead) parents and male siblings

Your god and his favorite tribe are blood thirsty iron age bandits

>>17911935
The little girls would have heard Moses speak and been taught Torah by their new family. They would have understood that they were idolaters and deserving of death. They were probably incredibly thankful that God spared them from death and hell for their sins.

>>17911926
Sounds more like they just wanted to avoid having to dash (more) infant brains if the surviving wives shat out kids only six months or less after the battle

If any other ancient army did this, say, Assyrians or Philistines, Christians would have no problem calling it mass rape and slavery.

>>17911939
You are totally sick and brainwashed.

>>17911915
The irony is, your “adoption” or "saving" defense requires ignoring the actual Hebrew phrasing (lo-yad’u mishkav zakhar = “have not known the lying of a male”), which has no relevance to adoption or servitude, but is directly relevant to sexual availability.

>>17911946
You are a reprobate with a desire to slander God.
>>17911940
No, they would have likewise adopted those children and spared them. You are supposed to take care of widows and orphans. That's not the point.

>>17911949
I already addressed this argument >>17911926

>>17911950
>You are a reprobate with a desire to slander God.
I'm just reading what the actual text says

>>17911955
You are accusing God of willfully commanding the enslavement of children for sexual purposes. Don't you understand how sick you sound?

>>17911953
Why does God’s perfect morality needs euphemistic reinterpretation and coping to be palatable to modern people? It's because our ethics outpaced ancient bronze age Jews. Same reason why civilized people don't slice off their children's foreskins

>>17911959
>You are accusing God of willfully commanding the enslavement of children for sexual purposes.
That's what the Hebrew text says. To be fair, Moses commanded them to do that, not YHWH directly. But YHWH thought it was cool.

>>17911960
You're wrong on both accounts. The Torah was in fact imperfect due to it being a shadow of things to come, but God cannot command evil. It seems more the case that modern men have evil sensibilities and suspicions. And Moses was working on behalf of God. He only disobeyed him twice, everything else was sanctioned.

>>17911979
>The Torah was in fact imperfect due to it being a shadow of things to come
>Christian reduced to saying God is imperfect but ONLY IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

Gigacope. The "imperfectness" was on humanity's part, not God's.

>>17911979
>And Moses was working on behalf of God.
Yes he was, when he ordered the Israelites to kill little children and take the surviving virgins as wives/slaves

>>17912021
>Gigacope. The "imperfectness" was on humanity's part, not God's
The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship.
>>17912023
The surviving virgins were adopted as daughters. It's no different now than modern conversions to Judaism, you are just perverted.

>>17912032
>The surviving virgins were adopted as daughters
Not what the text says. That's what YOU say to make the Bible acceptable to modern people.

>>17912034
Please tell me where it says that the Israelite men had sex with those girls. You won't find it.

>>17912038
ok >>17911955 >>17911909

>>17912066
That's AI. Please tell me where it says in the Bible that the Israelite men did such things. All you have is a computer telling you that the "culture of the age" would have compelled them to defile little girls. Totally disgusting and false.

>>17912071
>That's AI. Please tell me where it says in the Bible that the Israelite men did such things.
It says it right there.

>win a war
>kill all the men, rape the women and enslave the children
Why were people like that back then? And no, it was not just browns and chinks.

>>17911939
Why couldn't they do that for the little boys then?

>>17912689
>Why couldn't they do that for the little boys then?
It should be obvious. If they took the little boys in then they would expect to be treated as Israelites and inherit the land. Likewise, they would be deeply upset when their own women would not only convert to the religion but also fall in love with the Israelite men. It's just nature, women gravitate towards the strongest men. It is very likely that they would have acted as a fifth column in the country and had to die. Better to do it earlier before they would have to face the humiliation of losing their identity and their women. God is merciful in ways we do not understand.

>>17912765
>God is merciful by commanding his people to kill children

peak brainwashing

>>17912908
God is to be feared above all. The wicked will not remain on earth forever. Eventually God's patient reaches his of not and he orders to r extermination. And you and your children will perish forever.

>>17911675 (OP)
Truly a religion of the depraved.
Islam is the more moral religion. If not that, state atheism ala china.

>>17914223
I guess the christkikes gave up on trying to sound normal.

>>17914223
No, the children will be saved and serve as sex slaves for the true believers in paradise forever.

>>17914304
If God desires he spares the virgins for his rigtheous people to keep.

>>17911886
the jewish demon you worship only wants to use you as a battery

>>17914338
K.

>>17914325
Yes God is so benevolent he lets a six year old boy die of measles and then resurrects him in paradise to be some stinky shitskins catamite forever.

>>17914348
Imagine is he decides, you shall never experience an orgasm ever again.