>>7610440>>7603660(sorry for text vent) in conclusion, i think they were partially able to misrepresent what i've wrote because i've made the autistic mistake (in term of extrinsic persuasion) of replying to off-target pseudo-counter-arguments with technicalities (whether forced relocation should be defined as ethnic cleansing or not, where it is obvious to me that the world will eventually be unified and borderless, and that believe alive is completely overshadows locality). if my posts are read in order, i have never wrote that anyone should be "coercively" nor "permanently" moved, nor i have never used any related semantics, in any of my messages. i have clearly expressed that everyone should be "respectfully" handled to reduce suffering before they derailed the conversation with pure inventions and projection of their own fundamentally aggressive belief systems.
i am autistically over-literal and didn't know "relocation" carried arguably-convoluted contextual nuances. i owe my miscommunication to anyone who did not malignantly attempt to misrepresent me. sorry if i am insensitive. having to deal with the most toxic idiots on this website saturated my sensitiveness to most things.
eventually the ones who wins a debate or contest is the ones who benefits the most from it, because exponential speed of growth trumps everything. i am still learning how to emotionally connect art but i have anhedonia and this is difficult to recover from.