>>7613593>i wanna know what/who's are (with pic) you consider OUTSTANDINGHere's a page from who I'd consider to be the best artist currently actively published in the same magazine.
When I said "not outstanding", really what I meant was "not the best". I'd say my work is middle of the pack, maybe slightly better than the magazine's average. It's nowhere near as good as the best artists, but there's definitely worse.
But then again it's not like anybody is the best judge of their own work. I look at it and just see all the flaws.
Anyway I really just wanted to say that 4chan in general has a much higher standard for what's consider to be "professional artwork" than magazine editors, AKA the people who make the decision of who's good enough to publish.