What are some genuinely controversial styles or subject matters in 2025?

>>7639819 (OP)
referencing real world tragedies

>>7639819 (OP)
almost nothing is genuine these days. if it's controversial, it's probably just to rage bait for social media engagement.

>>7639819 (OP)
Lolis

>>7639953
/thread

>>7639819 (OP)
full blown anime (as a westerner)

>>7639819 (OP)
Off topic, started watching that show the other day. So fucking good. Bit juvenile in some ways, but the world building and character design is kino

>>7639859
What IS genuine? What is our current zeitgeist?

>>7639953
this

>>7640009
Why is that controversial? Anime is pretty mainstream.

>>7639819 (OP)
Pro-white sentiment in general, support for self-determination of white people in white countries.
Criticism of Jewish influence in politics and culture.
>>7639953
This too

>>7640724
>Criticism of Jewish influence in politics and culture
Really? Ive seen more and more anti jew sentiment in the outside net, although maybe not IRL.

>>7640725
The taboo is starting to break among younger zoomers because WW2 is so historically distant now. But they still mainly confine themselves to criticism of the Israeli government. If you talk about the role Jews play in advancing leftist politics in western countries you will still get called a conspiracy theorist and probably a racist

>>7640724
Do you have any examples of art that promote those?

Painting bloody vaginas makes a lot of people very, very angry. That's what I heard at least.

>>7639819 (OP)
character pairing with an implied underage character

>>7640716
>What is our current zeitgeist?
adherence to the algorithm lol. im not a luddite but tech is moving too fast for us to keep up with on a spiritual level

>>7639953
>draws only girls being raped by dobermans
>UMMM THEY'RE JUST DRAWINGS I DON'T CONDONE RAPE NOR DO I HAVE AN ATTRACTION TO ANIMALS
>eventually gets arrested for 400TB of beasty porn
same applies to lolipedos

>>7640857
>arrested
What kind of shithole country do you live in?

>>7640861
>dog rapers getting arrested = shithole country
Anon... what shithole do you live in? Canada?

>>7639819 (OP)
It's funny. The question asked in this negative way evokes the feeling of "nothing is really that good anymore". Yet, had you asked "What are some genuinely interesting styles and subject matters in 2025", you might have got better discussion here. That, or the thread would sink like an anchor because only negative-minded no-draw/zoomer begs come here nowadays.

The most controversial stance to take on the internet is a centrist libertarian. Since extremists control the conversation, they'll view you as having no morals and standing for nothing, even more so if you a make a point of pointing out how you can find good and bad in anything or saying that it's okay to not pick a side if you don't know which side is right. I think that's about as authentically controversial as you can be these days considering anything else is just impulsive outrage and not actually substantially controversial.

>>7640968
You won’t get arrested for being a centrist libertarian in any first world country.
You won’t even get kicked off youtube.

>>7641002
4chan is libertarian in its ideologies. Allows lolis, porn, nigger, troons, chuds, etc

>>7641009
And only 4chan from what we can see

>>7640861
Well, certainly it ain't Brazil, where you can freely be into bestiaity or be a pedophile (or even booth and at the same time), but god forbid you being into pregnant women (or big bellied women, or normal women in general, fuck this gay hell hole)

>>7642208
Brazil is such a funny server dude.

>>7640968
It's controversial more because it's a take that's wildly inconsistent in actual practice. It's always either not centrist or not libertarian, and always a smokescreen for an actual extremist viewpoint.

Most people who call themselves 'libertarian' just want the freedom to shoot guns and be racist but still oppose LGBT or drug freedoms.

>>7642224
that's because most of those retards don't understand that a true Libertarian places personal freedoms above all else even if they don't necessarily agree with it which is why people canned being one into 'holding no morals'. It's a spectrum left and right of libertarianism, but yes, many rightoids align more with being conservative or authoritarian than libertarian but still label themselves as such because they're braindead.

>>7639819 (OP)
Incest and fertilephilia according to daily socmed melties

>>7639819 (OP)
>Controversial subject matters
Tech accelerationism is extremely controversial. Because most artists are communitarian-minded rather than individualistic, they tend to fall into the congolese-style mindset of
>We have to all move forward, together.
And yes this is just crab bucket mentality but spun into a "polite" phrasing. It comes from the fact they know dick about anything besides art so they mindfuck themselves into nihilism and/or tribalistic mentalities by thinking everything works like art does. As in, rejecting the idea that objective standards OUTSIDE of art exist.

Going hard into tech accelerationism pisses off a ton of the artsy-crowd. You will enrage both trad boomers (even if you do trad art), and digital artists. The latter due to them cargo cult'ing onto incoherent social media trends like muh environmentalism, degrowth or letting "tech" people like Elon live rent free in their heads. Or other inane crap. A lot of art fans don't really care. You'd be seen as innovative in some ways if you were expressing cool shit.
To be clear, this isn't about AI - use garbage like MSpaint or crayon if you want - but the general thematics. Landian or Miladymaker shit.

>>7642224
>Most people who call themselves 'libertarian' just want the freedom to shoot guns and be racist but still oppose LGBT or drug freedoms.
Libertarian (really ancap, its the same) philosophy emphasizes ground rules that you must-not violate and anything else is fair game. I don't know of any libertarians that oppose drug freedoms, but I do know of several who would prefer to voluntarily not associate with drug users. There ARE some who don't seem to grasp that someone being LGBT doesn't violate the NAP (potentially as a strategy to try to befriend paleocons for the purpose of converting them/their audeinces). But the consistent ones will just say that they'd rather the option to simply deny service/interaction with such people because they see the use of state force as unethical.

Me again >>7643475
Here is a big example ("Right Click Save This") of extremely controversial tech-accelerationist art, but its extremely dated by this point so its not a good example of what's "now" controversial.