>>7643692>Is it not possible to say the same of drawing porn?You can say that, but then be prepared to fight off the goon brigade trying to tell you that any rule that applies to things magically doesn't apply to porn because they don't want it to.
Even drawn porn has been on a steady decline because there is so much of it, exactly because of too many kiddies and brows trying to make a quick buck, while the one who were already established, keep making bank.
Onlyfans follows the same principle where every whore believes they're going to make the big bucks but in the end the 1% earns 99% of the total income.
Traditional pornography is the same thing where the minority of actors and studios earn most of the total income.
AI slop is just the further evolution of the same problem that has already existed.
Those who already had successful patreons before the slop invasion, will continue to have it until an easily accessible ai can replicate their works.
In the end it's just porn, and the average consumer doesn't care if it's a drawing, a photograph or produced from digital aether, because they only want to get their nut off.
Anyone that disagrees is just coping hard or doing the old "the very rare exception make the rule" fallacy