Drawing is too boringly easy, I just find a photo and draw over it

>>7648412 (OP)
Don't litter the board with retarded threads please.

>>7648412 (OP)
pyw

>>7648412 (OP)
>it still looks like shit

>>7648417
You can't silence me
>>7648420
Why should I obey a peasant's order?
>>7648421
Jelly?

>>7648425
I can't be pb and jelly over unposted work

>>7648412 (OP)
>Drawing is too boringly easy, I just find a photo and draw over it
that's tracing, to be specific, which a dumb child can do. you're as good as a dumb child.

>>7648412 (OP)
if i gave you a photo could you draw over it for me?

might as well just use ai

>>7648450
You will post degenerate stuff

>>7648455
trace >>7648425 the reaction image you posted and show us

>>7648455
no I won't

>>7648457
Why would I trace a drawing?

>>7648459
because that's all you can do

>>7648458
Is that the image?

>>7648461
I never said I traced drawings

>>7648462
That is the image, brother

>>7648464
>I just find a photo and draw over it

>>7648470
You posted a drawing

>>7648472
I'm nta

Will the real faggot OP say something? Or did he disappear when challenged?

>>7648464
you trace prompts

>>7648417
fpbp

/thread

>>7648412 (OP)
>Drawing is too boringly easy, just AI generate a picture and draw over it

its that super simple

hide

>>7648502
What is stopping you?

>>7648412 (OP)
Based tracechuds

>>7648621
his spine

>>7648458
And shit

>>7648790
I hope you ain't OP.

>>7648790
No wonder you THINK it's easy. This is sloppy and high beg at best.
Just another ic dunning kruger.

this is just a false flag to make tracing as learning a bad thing, when every beginner should learn from it. It's a good way to humble and make them actually learn a few things. Your brain doesn't automatically turn off when you trace it's just your impression.
It's obvious how op makes her personality as shitty as possible. Hopefully you guys are smart enough to know this.

>>7649275
I listen to myself anyway.

>>7649275
OP never once mentioned tracing. Paintovers aren't the same thing as tracing.

>>7649314
>OP never once mentioned tracing
>I just find a photo and draw over it

>>7649317
>>I just find a photo and draw over it
Point to the part where tracing is mentioned.
You realize that there's a thing called paintover, right?
This is an example of it:
>>7648458
>>7648790

Either you don't have a clue what tracing is, or you don't have a clue paintovers are a thing.

>>7649323
>you have to explicitly use a term in order to express the idea

>>7649275
>>7649317
"In art, tracing involves using a transparent material like tracing paper to copy the outlines of an image. Paintover, on the other hand, is painting on top of an existing image or artwork, often to modify it or create a new visual effect. Essentially, tracing is about duplication, while paintover is about transformation."

>>7649326
I used a fucking example done by OP. Stop being an egotistical Karen, JFC.

>>7649328
>>7649330
distinction without a difference. it's lazy copying.

>>7649201
You're out of your mind if you think drawing is hard, even kids do it when they are 3

>>7649365
>You're out of your mind if you think drawing is hard
Drawing competently is hard. Please try to use your brain to follow context.

>>7649333
>distinction without a difference
The difference is clearly explained. You're either a dishonest person with a fragile ego, or too stupid to be capable of reading comprehension.

>>7649420
What context? When did anyone bring anything about drawing competently and what does that even mean? Be competent enough for what?

>>7649426
I understood OP's boasting (clear bait, which is why I'm responding as I do) as a statement aimed at people that have trouble learning to draw. As if drawing is an easy endeavour, broadly speaking.
My point is that drawing in a competent manner, one that shows clear mastery or at least clear understanding of fundamentals, isn't an easy endeavour, because it requires a lot of practice and mileage.
OP's paintover shows his boasting hasn't any foundations to stand on.

>>7649445
What did he boast about?

>>7649426
I understood OP's boasting (clear bait, which is why I'm responding as I do) as a statement aimed at people that have trouble learning to draw. As if drawing is an easy endeavour, broadly speaking.
My point is that drawing in a competent manner, one that shows clear mastery or at least clear understanding of fundamentals (which is what the vast majority of the people on this board are streaving for, the people that OP was trying to mock), isn't an easy endeavour, because it requires a lot of practice and mileage.
OP's paintover shows his boasting has no foundations to stand on.

>>7649449
>Drawing is too boringly easy
About drawing being easy, even boringly so.
Anyone that attempted "making it", knows this isn't true.

>>7649456
When did he say he was "making it"? Is this some kinda of weird projection onto OPs?

>>7649461
Are you OP, or willfully disingenuous?
But sure, I'll play your little game. What do you think OP's true intention, I apparently misunderstood, was? Blogpoasting?

>>7649465
Shitposting? How the fuck would I know what his intentions are

>>7649468
>Shitposting?
Then we agree. To me it's clear ragebait. How is the bait presented? As an outlandish claim where he pretends to be so talented, that drawing for him is easy to the point of being boring.

>>7649472
Drawing is easy, he isn't wrong on that. Kids do it, what makes you think it isn't

>>7649473
Now I'm sure you're OP. You are just trying to waste my time by going in circles. Enjoy your self circlejerking.
I made my point clear. OP isn't very good at drawing. That level of drawing is indeed easy.

>>7649476
So we agree on that, Jesus took you awhile

>>7649479
Yeah, we agree. OP isn't good at drawing.

>"drawing" thread
>look inside
>painting

>When instant cake mixes were introduced in the 1950s as part of a broader trend to simplify the life of the American housewife by minimizing manual labor, housewives were initially resistant: the mixes made cooking too easy, making their labor and skill seem undervalued. As a result, manufacturers changed the recipe to require adding an egg; while there are likely several reasons why this change led to greater subsequent adoption, infusing the task with labor appeared to be a crucial ingredient

>>7648412 (OP)
Truke

Wow lots of really smart people discussing about my drawing. Is this what famous artists feel like?

>>7649857
congratulations anon you are famous and made it!

>>7649857
You're getting just a pinch of what famous artists go through. Savor it.

Waoh I can finally retire, that was easy

>>7649857
Dunning krugers get this treatment as well.

>>7649894
Is that the horror movie guy from the 80s

>>7649900
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a particular area tend to overestimate their competence.

>>7649903
Is that the new Donkey Kong game or is that the old Donkey Kong 1 and 2

>>7649773
looks like shit though

what an awful thread, retards arguing back and forth for hours and wasting their time on some retarded shitposter who most like used ai for his post who has another retard trying to crab an ai shitposter. yikes

>>7649903
The Dunning-Kruger effect actually looks like this.
Confidence correlates with competence, they always go up together, and there is no mount stupid or valley of despair. The study quite literally doesn't even have enough data points to draw the meme interpretation graph.

>>7649947
>le ai excuse

Come on now. You got proof of that accusation?

>>7649954
digital brushes don't make that kinda of realistic thick wet on wet texture

>>7649958
There are painting programs with fluid simulation based brush engines.

>>7649964
I won't believe it until anon comes back with the gamer word written using that same texture

>>7649965
That is piss easy to do with AI.
Why don't you accept that it's plausible and also functionally meaningless? Your life quality would probably improve.

>>7649967
I want to see it

>/ic/ getting baited by AIsloppa
lmao
It even left part of the text in
>noo it's just overlayed
show software and layers

>>7649974
I'm pretty sure we all know it's AI. We're just having a little fun.

>dunning krugger
>it was ai all along

turns out shitposters can't draw

fucking clockwork kek.

I don't think that's AI I just think that he literally just painted over that photo

>>7649974
If anything this is evidence of an actual paintover instead of AI reworking the whole artwork.

>>7649773
SAAR THIS IS MUCH AMAZING DRAWING SAAR

>>7650566
gm saaar

>no response
So it was AI lol what a faggot

>>7649958
Rebelle and Artrage do
There's also the Memileo Impasto brushes for Krita which were being raved about a few weeks back on here: https://krita-artists.org/t/memileo-impasto-brushes/92952

>>7649974
Usually Img2Img will mutilate text like that. I agree with the anon who said that it's more indicative of it not being AI

>>7651593
How many people actually use those programs and brushes to paint and draw with? It doesn't help that it looks exactly like the Dall-e oil paint prompts. I'm going with it's AI till proven otherwise

>>7651620
More than you would think, but less than there should be considering how widespread digital art is. I attribute it to how many artists are using only 2% of the power of their programs. HRB Fundamentalism is limiting cancer