screenshot of early concept at Pixar Studios

>>7662952 (OP)
>mixing cause and effect
lust should be a talking dick

>>7662952 (OP)
Only the male concepts are right.
The female ones confuse the emotion of desire with the object of desire.

if this shit is official and not a troll, it's only further proof the west has fallen. Outsourcing everything to ESLs because it's cheaper, leaving their people out to die.

>>7663273
inside out (presuming it was for the 2015 one and there hasn't been any sequel or anything), is the only good Pixar movie in the last 15 years as of 2023 when I officially gave up on even checking them out with the unwatchable horseshit that came out that year, so you're wrong.

>>7662952 (OP)
I think the best version of arousal for a teen girl would be something akin to a erotic fanfic writer, or shipper, or something like that. Something about having a male demon with a raging hard on being the personification for arousal for a woman seems just a tad bit creepy.

As for the quality of the 'art'... well, I optimistically assume these are super early iterative concepts, rather than anything too fleshed out, but the fact that there's under sketches and the artist even signed the page makes me think there was more effort placed into these drawings than the finished product seems to portray, which is a little worrying.

>>7663361
I enjoyed inside out. I'm talking about the spelling errors for basic english words. Shit is ESL

>>7663384

Who cares? They got paid, you didn't.

>>7662952 (OP)
The rightmost is pretty sex and fits best with the original designs. Only flaw is that it fails to portray lust clearly, unless she is supposed to be laidback most of the time until a person sees something arousing. Everyone else looks horrendous and unofficial

>>7663273
it's a meme you retard

>>7663387
lmfao just say you're a shitskin