NEW EXECUTIVE ORDER
>The executive order seeks to eliminate "reputational risk" as a factor for denying banking services, with potential fines for banks found in violation. There's also a possibility that banks found to have already engaged in debanking could be punished retroactively.

We are so back!
ART IS BACK BABY

>>7682534 (OP)
>There's also a possibility that banks found to have already engaged in debanking could be punished retroactively.
Oh they absolutely should. I don't think there's anyone who would defend this behaviour, and it'd be an easy win for the politicians, ON TOP of drumming up some easy tax revenue from fining the fuck out of those banker cunts.
DO IT!

>>7682534 (OP)
>implying the refusal to fund loli rape porn is purely out of reputation
the projection is insane

>>7682565
do you work as a journalist?

>>7682565
Take the blinders off and see things outside of your own dumbass little perspective.

>>7682534 (OP)
Holy shit orange man is on top of the banks. Eh but did trump say anything about payment platform system?

>>7682575
>>7682578
Loli rape porn isn't protected by freedom of speech. This order is to protect people who are debanked due to political bias, which doesn't include companies refusing to sell jerk-off material, btw. Go look up the legal definition of obscenity lololol

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/08/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-guarantees-fair-banking-for-all-americans/

>>7682534 (OP)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TRANNYSPAMMER ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>7682583
>>7682565
why do you short-circuit over loli rape?
Do you live under a rock? People were debanked over loli 10 years ago, they creeped now towards all lewd material, political content and so on.

Now, personally I think loli rape art should be legal (and in my country it is), since drawings aren't people and paper doesn't need to consent to be drawn on. It would not even need to be covered by free speech, it should be okay to draw whatever.

That said this isn't about loli-rape, it's about payment processors power tripping and their arbitrary rulings.

>>7682583
WRONG
>Sec. 3. Definitions. (a) The term “politicized or unlawful debanking” refers to an act by a bank, savings association, credit union, or other financial services provider to directly or indirectly adversely restrict access to, or adversely modify the conditions of, accounts, loans, or other banking products or financial services of any customer or potential customer on the basis of the customer’s or potential customer’s political or religious beliefs, or on the basis of the customer’s or potential customer’s lawful business activities that the financial service provider disagrees with or disfavors for political reasons.
>on the basis of the customer’s or potential customer’s lawful business activities that the financial service provider disagrees with
Try not to ACK yourself

>>7682583
>Executive Order 14157, titled "Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans", was signed by President Trump to prevent "debanking" practices, ensuring equal access to financial services regardless of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities. The order directs federal regulators to investigate and address politically motivated or unlawful debanking.
It explicitly states any lawful activities cannot be debanked. It's over, you lost, moshe

>>7682583
>The digital assets industry has also been the target of unfair debanking initiatives.
>These practices erode public trust in banking institutions and regulators, harm livelihoods, freeze payrolls, and impose significant financial burdens on law-abiding Americans.

the cited article is not the executive order itself. If you look at the content it is very much about art:

>Sec. 4. Removing Reputation Risk and Politicized or Unlawful Debanking. (a) Within 180 days of the date of this order, each appropriate Federal banking regulator shall, to the greatest extent permitted by law, remove the use of reputation risk or equivalent concepts that could result in politicized or unlawful debanking, as well as any other considerations that could be used to engage in such debanking, from their guidance documents, manuals, and other materials (other than existing regulations or other materials requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking) used to regulate or examine financial institutions over which they have jurisdiction.

keyword: "or"
and:
>"as well as any other considerations that could be used to engage in such debanking, from their guidance documents, manuals, and other materials"

>>7682534 (OP)
I approve, mainly because it irritates the insane people (person?) lurking here

>>7682581
Adobe can still fuck you over, but maybe they'll think twice about it (they won't - they love fucking you over)

>>7682640
>youtube grifter
lmao

also
>all lawful citizes
sorry, lolishitters, you already done goofed

>>7682661
>it was real in my mind
42% soon

>>7682648
>>7682651
>>7682652
Again, porn is not protected. The order does not negate the decades-old obscenity laws in place. Maybe in two more weeks!

>T-T-TRANNY!
it don't work, /v/igroid

>>7682666
Protected from what, retard? The order states any lawful activity CANNOT BE DEBANKED. It's not about freedom of speech, retard.
Show me where porn is illegal.

the troon is losing it

>trannies get btfo by exposing themselves and getting all normies against them
>now goonertroons get btfo as well and all the content sloppers and grifters are exposing themselves
The insane gooner meltdown has been the funniest shit in a decade

>>7682654
One person lol >>7682667

>>7682666
...you're a brown esl, aren't you?

>>7682670
In the coming months you are going to learn that porn is not a right and patreon still won't give you your coom back

>>7682681
>two more months
AHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF TROONS

>distribute porn which cannot be lawfully distributed
>become unlawful citizen
>B-B-B--BUT MUH EXECUTIVE ORDER?!? YOU TROONS AAAAAAAAH UR MAD!!!
I can't stop laughing fellow albino puritans

>>7682685
>distribute porn which cannot be lawfully distributed
Cite the law lol

>REDEEM THE LAW SAAR
all that internet but asks for sauce on 4chan
what an absolute pajeet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_laws_by_region

>>7682642
I think that retard is probably abused as a child and is on some kind of crusade against art, instead of having the courage to fight the actual child sex trafficking or child abuse, that retard decided that those who draw loli are the problem, or those who consume the content are the problem, and blindly support censorship that is quasi related, despite when told NSFW is not all loli, victory at all cost, even if it means to hurt innocent people along the way.

>>7682693
Cite the US law, tranny
Nobody gives a shit what you do in mumbai

>>7682693
It's legal, ranjeet. If it were illegal, it wouldn't take going to payment processors to get it taken down, the hags would've gone to the law. I know this is difficult to comprehend when you live in a shithole, but illegal things are illegal.

>obscenity laws don't apply because THEY JUST DONT OK?
You're not interested in getting proven wrong because you're just here to shitpost at best, so why bother explaining to you the complexities you aren't even literate enough to comprehend besides reacting like a boomer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

this is the most you'll get, faggots
now gtfo my board or pyw

>>7682693
Ban pornography, destroy creative endeavors in the process and come after artists, one of the most creative, chaotic, hypersexual force on this blue planet, you deserve what is coming to you.

>not buying nft
>not using ai
>not paying for crypto
>not defending pornography
simple as

The coming days will be hard for you, but look at the bright side: you'll probably kill yourself soon

>>7682704
yep. the whole ordeal is specifically targeting cases where payment processors overruled actual law for moral or "brand-risk" reasons.

It's a really good change if it stops them from doing economic terrorism and nuking entire sectors of commerce they don't agree with.
Very big win for small companies and independent creators.

>GAISE GAISE NFT WILL MAKE YOU MONEY
>no
>AAAAAH Y R U MAD COPE DO YOU HATE MONEY

>GAISE GAISE AI IS THE FUTURE
>no
>AAAAAH FUCKING ADAPT OR DIE

>GAISE GAISE USE CRYPTO
>no
>AAAAAAH WHY DO YOU HATE FREEDOM KILL YOURSELF

>GAISE GAISE THEYRE BANNING PORN AND THEY WILL COME AFTER YOU
>no
>AAAAAAH TRANNY WHY DO YOU HATE FREEDOM OF SPEECH YOU WILL KILL YOURSELF

nah
you discord transvestites from brazil should really change up your m.o.
it's obvious every single time

loving the seethe 2bh

they/xhem can't help xheirselves
their cp is getting banned so they can do nothing but seethe

Christianity bros, we can't stop winning!

>tranny tries taking to me
lol

>>7682727
>1639554640666.gif
>666
>>7682666
>666
(((it))) is afraid

>>7682720
small win, win a battle, but not the war, artists are a creative bunch, hit them where it truly hurts, and they wont even see us coming.

>>7682749
two more battles, fellow they/them

It fucking PÆÏŅŚ me that trying to make a serious thread results in less than 10 replies but a thread like this gobbles up all the traffic like a fat bastard, maybe I really should just hit up reddit

we have collectively decided not to give 7682763 the (you)s

>>7682720
>It's a really good change if it stops them from doing economic terrorism and nuking entire sectors of commerce they don't agree with.
>Very big win for small companies and independent creators.
That's the key, they're going after sectors that make a fuckton of money and said money is used to pay taxes so they're taking money from OrangeGod which is why this law passed.