>>211673143 Those are actually Chinese soldiers. In the prior shot they show a Chinese general expressing concern that their soldiers don't have enough cold weather equipment to survive as if a single Chinese general in the Korean War gave a fuck about Chinese casualties since they can all be replaced by more Chinamen at any given time.
>>211671653 >I can think of a worse fate Yeah, jumping from your office while taking 4 times more casualties than us during 1982 in a single morning. Either that or losing 50% of your territory to threats. Mejichango
>>211674048 Not the same nigga. You also lost Afghanistan after 20 years of fighting, you lost 50K at nam, you list at Mogadishu, you almost lost at Korea and had to hide behind an armistice and dig yourself a trench to cope.