IMG_9616
md5: bfb6c0d4b3a2fc8695d4340c11c475cf
🔍
Is your country a pacifist country?
Sexually abuse this gooks face
>>211837941 (OP)>180 countries have chosen not to have themwhy not are those countries stupid?
>>211837941 (OP)People maliciously ignore the fact that the Non Proliferation Treaty is "meant" to achieve disarmament as well as prevent countries from acquiring nukes. Nuclear country not only are they not disarming but they are either expanding their stocks or their delivery methods.
It just doesn't make any sense to take the NPT seriously.
>>211837941 (OP)We're a pacifist country that happens to find it funny when other countries go to war so we sell them a ton of weapons to make the fun last
>>211838151When she says chosen not to have them she means that they didn’t develop them in time and now nuclear powers prevent them from getting them
>>211837941 (OP)9 chads get to fuck 180 bitches
>>211838151We'd get nuke the second we got them
>>211837941 (OP)>ChosenIran is "choosing" to get them and this is the result
>>211837941 (OP)built for intense, nonstop, mindnumbing sexual intercourse with me
ARM EVERY NATION WITH NUCLEAR BOMBS
Every country who can build nukes should get them as seen with Ukraine and Iran.
Only nukes are a true security guarantee. Once every country who can develop them starts building them there's only enough glowies from nuclear countries to prevent each one from building them.
What are they going to do, sanction half the planet?
>>211839330No they'll blow up your facilities and send precision missles through the windows of your nuclear scientists a la iran
Nuclear powers will prevent nuclear proliferation by any means necessary
>>211837941 (OP)Canada actually has nuclear weapons.
it is I who possess them.
I have 1 ton of 95% enriched uranium, and 10kg of plutonium.
>>211839330Iran showed they'll just kill the people making it, Ukraine had nukes but were convinced to give it up for Crimea and "security guarantees" (so much for that), and I know people say they wouldn't have been able to maintain it but if South Africa can do it so could they
Britain has nuclear weapons, more commonly known as my fists
>>211839330>Every country who can build nukesNukes are easy to build, it's not some secret technology. Any country could do it. The problem isn't building them but doing so without getting bombed/invaded/destroyed by nuclear powers.
>>211839503So why didn't they with Fat Kim ???
>>211839503>>211839586>>211839798Small price to pay for true sovereignty.
Didn't stop India, Pakistan and North Korea.
They can't stop 20+ countries who can build a nuke now.
The first nuke struck God before it hit Japan and now we all face the consequences
>>211838151The US told us we didn't need them since they would have our back. We've been able to build them since the 50s.
any country can build nukes
your first main problem is finding plutonium and uranium, not a real problem if your cunt has nuclear powerplants
the main filter are ballistic missiles, if you don't have rocket scientists your nukes are useless
defectors (bribed or idealogues) are also a real thing, see south africa, taiwan, spain