>>211944074
That would be funny if mandatory voter ID were required to vote but only via passport. Both nonwhites and republicans are less likely to have passports so both sides would seethe
>>211944019 (OP)
They would cum buckets and BEG you to 'vassalise' them on the spot if you know what I mean ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) :O ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
>>211944204 >Voter suppression today favors Democrats
Wait, aren't Republicans explicitedly carving out exceptions like firearm IDs being okay, but uni student ID not just to rig the thing in their favor? How can it still favor Democrats? If so, Republicans are fucking retarded.
>>211944751
Weird carve outs like that probably don't really have much impact.
The main impact these laws could have is suppressing turnout, which under the Obama era coalition would have favored Republicans, but in todays environment favors democrats.