Neanderthals were actually very smart, probably smrter than humans, and lost to homo sapiens shitskins only because of lower population.
Modern people with most neanderthal dna(east asians and Europeans) are the smartest people in the world.
They were way more cultured than homo sapiens and created art and many craftsmanship techniques

it's survival of the fittest not survival of the smartest
neanerds lost, sorry not sorry

>>212025266 (OP)
Supposedly Neanderthals couldn't form languages like Humans, proved to be a heavy disadvantage for the Neanderthals.

>>212025266 (OP)
Varg says white people are just Neanderthals.

>>212025266 (OP)
I enjoyed the Jews are Neanderthals theory from /pol/.

>>212025311
Losing the same way again
>>212025370
Possibly their vocal chords allowed for less sounds

>>212025370
Actually they were capable of speaking and had higher pitch voice from anatomical view, also had same genes for speaking ability as humans

>>212025379
>le 2% face

>>212025385
Post that theory

I'm a homo

>>212025266 (OP)
first civilization was from brown homo sapiens

>>212025865
It's physically impossible to make a civilization with population of 3000

>>212026068
what a weak cucks lmao. TNE total neanderthals extinct

>>212025865
so? civilization is unnatural

If aboriginals had gone extinct before australians arrived there, then abbos probably wouldn't even have been classified as homo sapiens sapiens but some other subspecies. It's interesting to think about

>>212025865
Didn't really serve them well in the long run eh?

>>212026574
truke

>>212025379
East asians are closer to this status

Bump

>>212025266 (OP)
>Modern people with most neanderthal dna
>are the smartest people in the world.
are you sure?

>>212025379
>Varg says
LOL

>>212031525
>abos
They barely have any. Less than Europeans and East Asians.

>>212025379
>Varg says
why did you consider posting this a good idea

things like empathy, guilt, shame, depression, morality, self-reflection, self-hate and other deeply complex emotions and psychological phenomena all come from Neanderthals. Evident by certain races--whom thought to be more pure Homo Sapiens-- lacking and never understanding all of those

>>212031638
they and other black people in south east asia have the most. average 5-7%.

open up any source (just know denisova is not a spieces, but neanderthal subdivision.

>>212031525
They are about same as euros and east asians, but also have denisovan which could worsen them in some parts

>>212032088
Niggers and Chinese could also be classified as two subspecies, but who would say they have the same capacity. Also denisovans are considered seperate species by most modern schoolars, some call it subdivision of homo longi, not neanderthal.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_longi

>>212025266 (OP)
how dis make you feel humanboi?

>>212032088
>(just know denisova is not a spieces, but neanderthal subdivision
Since when?

>>212025379
>Varg says

>>212032118
>>212032251
as of yet denisova isn't its own seperate spieces, it doesnt even have a formal classification or latin name. All it is a tooth and hypotetical dna reconstruction.
>homo longi
also isn't classified as different from neanderthal

so abbos are the most neanderthalish still

>>212032610
Since always as there isn't enough evidence.

>>212032839
>homo longi
>homo neanderthalis
>same thing
Are you somali refugee or something?

>>212032943
Just because something has been hypothesised and well regarded doesn't make it into anything more than a hypothesis until better evidence comes.

>Are you somali refugee or something?
no i just fucking love science

>>212033106
So all these fossils from neanderthal, to homo erectus are homo sapiens because there ain't enough evidence proving otherwise by some retarded standards?

>>212033106
Also you didn't address the fact that even subspecies/same species groups could differentiate considerably in terms of intelligence depending on genetical distance, if you of course don't believe that pygmies and japanese have same intellectual ability.

>>212033106
> doesn't make it into anything more than a hypothesis
But you're doing the same thing.

Non-homosapien ancestry rankings in descending order:
Whites 1-2%
East Asians 4-6%
Native Americans 5-8%
Melanisains and Aboriginal Australians 5-9%
Sub Saharan African blacks 6-19%

>>212033217
there are hundreds of neanderthal and erectus fossils, a tooth, bits of jaw and broken rib for denisova. These are not the same level of evidence.
>>212033364
i dont engage in modern day racism

>>212033425
no u

>>212033453
I think there might be actually much more. We just don't know that these parts of modern us where traits of some extinct human sub-specie. For example Denisovan was found quite recent, who know how many other things were existing.

>>212033453
East asians have 2-3%, Europeans generally have 2%, native americans 2-3% as east asians and the most pure homo sapiens are sardinians with 1%

>>212033534
Obviously a troll

>>212033559
East Asians have about 20% more Neanderthal ancestry than Europeans plus a bit of denisovan, so maybe it's more like 3-5% or 3-4% for them. Native Americans have a much higher amount Neanderthal and denisovan than east Asians and Europeans though. Peruvians have an average of like 7% Neanderthal ancestry lol.

>>212033738
No, east Asians don't have even 1% of denisovan dna, its less than 0.1% in most cases. Indeginous Peruvians actually have 1.4% of archaics, actually less than both euros and east asians.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9882123/.
Don't want to encounter your ignorance anymore. Fuck off like the somalian refugee from faroes did

>>212033844
That study literally says :
>it was recently discovered that Peruvians exhibit the largest number of high frequency derived archaic alleles and the largest number of candidate loci for adaptive introgression

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400396/
>the Peruvians (PEL) harbor the largest amount of high frequency mutations of archaic origin than any other single population, especially when using Neanderthals as bait

>>212034197
It's not 7% it's 1.4-1.5% according to study methods.

>>212034418
Hmm yeah I'm not quite sure where I got that from, I must have misremembered something.

>>212034530
It says natives have this amount but Peruvians selected some useful adaptation from archaics and thats probably real reason for more archaic alleles (they are usefull)