>>212105305 (OP) >nooo, companies have to provide me services indefinitely >how dare you stop supporting a 15-year-old game
When passed, this will simply make publishers switch to a subscription-based model for everything, including single-player-only games. We will see how the paypigs like that.
>>212105975
The other arguments I've seen are just as retarded. If you think it is reasonable to expect companies to relinquish their intellectual property rights and give it to the "community" when they stop supporting a game, you have a very childish perspective.
>>212106084 >continue function of said videogames without the involvement from the side of the publisher. >The initiative does not seek to acquire ownership of said videogames, associated intellectual rights or monetization rights
>You get to keep your intellectual property, but we demand you give us permission to do whatever we want with it
This is pure manchild nonsense.
>>212106113
Oh I thought they separated Italy by region. This is common because I think they might be a lot different than west Germans to East Germans in a lot of ways.