A 51-year-old man with a Hebrew neck tattoo was arrested after crucifying a Christian pastor in Arizona and placing a crown of thorns on his head.

Adam Christopher Sheafe admitted to planning the ritualistic killing of 14 Christian leaders across 10 states.

Obsessed with the Old Testament and militantly opposed to the New, Sheafe says his actions were part of a mission he called “Operation First Commandment.”

He was caught en route to crucify two Catholic priests in Sedona.

Kino schizo moment

kekerino

>>212156369 (OP)
this is what every jew thinks about Europeans btw they only slightly tolerate us because America bankrolls them but if America stopped bankrolling them you would get this sort of behavior. They believe all Europeans are romans and harbor slave moralist resentment towards the europeans for having conquered and sissified them

>>212156369 (OP)
average flyover moment

>>212156432
He's not a jew Paco, what do you also think every other white woman is asian for having a tattoo in asian scribbles

>>212156432
Truke
>>212156457
Arizona isn't flyover

>>212156432
He's a born and raised Christian tho. Tattoo with god's name is literally the most unjewish thing one can do.

This is one of the two logical endpoints of Protestantism. It's either schizo Al-Qaeda tier fanatical evangelical dispensationalism like this guy or baby coded "Jesus is your friend buddy" tier feel good Episcopalian slop.

>>212156471
This guy was an anti-Christian extremist motivated by JEWISH religious hatred. Nowhere is this in any of the news reports about him. He horribly killed a man who was by all accounts a decent, selfless pastor.

The fact that he does not appear to be ethnically Jewish (he was raised as Christian) is irrelevant. If a White person who was raised as a Christian suddenly converted to Islam and started murdering Christian priests, would FOX News not describe them as being motivated by Islamic religious fanaticism?!

The Jewish religion is a hateful, extremist religion. It is filled with religious holidays that celebrate massacres of whole peoples, including women and children. The story of the crucifixion of Jesus absolutely fits with the historical pattern of Jewish hatred and revenge.

In the Jewish media, only Christians and Muslims can be violent religious extremists, never Jews. When a man is motivated by Jewish religious hatred and obsessions to commit torture-murder against Christian pastors, they leave the obvious, self-confessed, branded-by-Hebrew-tattoos Jewish component out of all the stories. "Judaism? Never heard of it!"

>>212156511
All that to just say he was a P*otestant

>>212156487
>>212156471
sure buddy, That's why after all these years jews still fly to italy just to flip off the arch of titus

>>212156511
Bottom line is he killed a guy because he's a dangerous schizo that should be locked away from society.

>>212156511
>he was raised as Christian
Yes he's white christian
>If a White person who was raised as a Christian suddenly converted to Islam
Irrelevant, he didn't convert to judaism. No rabbi would convert a nutcase like that
>>212156535
You're NOT roman btw

>He was caught en route to crucify two Catholic priests in Sedona.
God protects His church

>>212156535
That's it? Would be based if they bombed it

>>212156487
My high-IQ, rightwing, jewish twitter guru pointed this out to me and now I feel very smart knowing that this viral groyper twitter post has been debunked.

>>212156511
catholicuck finds out his religion is a spinoff of judaism

>>212156552
>No rabbi would convert a nutcase like that
the same rabbis that practice Metzitzah B'peh? those holy ones ?

>>212156578
Other way around really. There's a lot more seething about Christ in the Pharisee Talmud compiled in 700AD than there is seething about the Pharisees in the New Testament compiled centuries earlier.

>>212156533
The guy he killed was a protestant, Seamus. You can maybe let go of your sectarian hard on for just a moment and see this guy was just fucking crazy and not playing for any previously established team.

My boomer evangelical dad used to be a hardcore Zionist, but over the last couple years he has become highly redpilled on Jews and he even told the pastor at our church about it.

>>212156585
Probably, anyway they wouldn't convert someone with that neck tattoo, never mind you can look at him and see he doesn't have the skullcap, beard, jew hair etc., I think he's a messianic jew which is a branch of christianity

>>212156618
The evil prey on the evil first. He was raised in the Protestant tradition, which is where he induced into his evil.

The effects of christianism

Why are jews so evil ?

>UHHH AKSHULLY HES A CHRISTIAN EVEN THOUGH HE HAS A HEBREW NECK TATTTO
t. Coping yids ITT

>>212156562
>>212156575
>>212156578
>>212156645
>>212156661
America First.

>>212156675
His life trajectory is par for the course of a dispensationalist lunatic evangelical.

>>212156675
Do you think Steph Curry is jewish?

>>212156687
My evangelical dad is a former Zionist evangelical who got redpilled and hates Zionism now.

>>212156369 (OP)
>Obsessed with the Old Testament and militantly opposed to the New, Sheafe says his actions were part of a mission he called “Operation First Commandment
Very based. Old testament is true christianity.

>>212156472
Who flies to Arizona though

>>212156369 (OP)
>Hebrew
Saar that was made up by pakis saar you can see it's thai saar

>>212156712
THIS, Jesus never heard of the new testament

>>212156706
based

>>212156726
Do you think every spic named Israel is jewish?

>>212156730
Jesus is God so He knows what is written you crypto-kike

>>212156706
Good for him, but Salvation is only from the Church. There's more to spiritual life than rejecting certain evil ideas, you need to join into the True Israel, which is the Church as established by Jesus Christ and the Apostles.

>>212156742
No but I do know of a spic named Hadrian who burned jerusalem to the ground and whose legions raped everyone there

>>212156712
>Very based. Old testament is true christianity.
>Paul describes Israel as an olive tree and says that “some of the branches were broken off,” while these Gentile converts “were grafted in their place to share the richness of the olive tree” (Rom. 11:17). He reminds his Gentile readers, “They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast only through faith. So do not become proud, but stand in awe. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you” (20–21). Paul is clearly not describing the wholesale replacement of one covenant people with another, nor is he describing two separate plants, one Jewish and one Gentile (it’s hard to understand how anyone could read the epistle to the Romans and come away with that message). Instead, he’s saying he continues to prune and maintain the olive tree, the People of God that began with Israel. With the arrival of Christ and the formation of the Church, you have not the disregarding of Israel, but the pruning: those Jews who reject Christ are cast off, and those Gentiles who accept him are grafted in.
Every aspect of Christianity rejects dispensationalism, from the very beginning it's inherently anti-Christian

>>212156472
Arizona is definitely flyover, sorry.

>>212156752
>the True Israel, which is the Church as established by Jesus Christ and the Apostles.
That's not in the Gospels, nor did Jesus directly say it. That only started as a second century development, after 100 AD.

>>212156712
based, old testament mythos is way more kino
new testament is just nonsensical feefee slop

Fine he's protestant, so his mental illness is once again caused because we didnt kill enough protestants in the 1600's

>>212156815
>>212156818
consider suicide useful idiot- uh sorry I meant shabbos goy

>>212156771
Also Galatians which makes it clear that the church is the Israel of God.
Also Paul says that not all who are of Israel are Israel (in other words, being Jewish of the flesh does not mean you are part of the Kingdom)
Even in the Old Testament there already is foreshadowing of all this with Isaac and the children of the promise, not the flesh, Abraham's seed being of the promise, and all that.
These are just a few examples of how dispensationalism contradicts the Bible. There are many other examples too.

>>212156432
also 90% of protestans are zionist btw

>>212156838
What?

>>212156369 (OP)
Why god didn't protected the christian pastor?
In my country these guys are preachings miracles everyday

>>212156852
Only in our shitholes

>>212156488
>baby coded "Jesus is your friend buddy" tier feel good Episcopalian slop.
I like that

Religion doesn't need to be overly serious

>>212156533
Protestants believe in the new testament

>>212156846
How about this?
Paul never said that the Church replaced Israel. Romans 11 literally warns Gentiles not to be arrogant and says God hasn't rejected His people.

The actual verse you're talking to:
>Galatians 6:16
>Peace and mercy be upon all who walk by this rule, and upon the Israel of God
The meaning it's not clear by the text alone. Scholars think it refers specifically to Jewish believers, not the whole Church. Again, the idea that the Church is the “true Israel” only really gained traction after 100 AD.

>>212156815
>That only started as a second century development, after 100 AD.
You mean around the time the New Testament was formulated? Idiot. Matthew 21:43 has Jesus directly the Jewish leaders that God is going to take his blessing away from them if they don't cease in their prideful and arrogant ways (they didn't).

>>212156641
Lutheran?

>>212156929
>Why god didn't protected the christian pastor?
He was a protestant, so not really a Christian.

>>212156992
>Scholars
I literally could not care less about how some homosexual atheistic ""scholars"" interpret the Bible.

>>212156771
>Paul describes
>>212156846
>Paul says
Jesus never heard of Paul

>>212156488
> Al-Qaeda tier ... fanatical evangelical
You don't know what that word means.
Al Qaeda and all the wahhabists/salafists are purists. They are as close to their texts as possible.
Evangelicals, baptists, episcopals, mormons, they have deviated from scripture and stand in opposition to what the Bible teaches. They are racists fronting as christcucks to mask their shame.
But I do agree that the christianity joke has gone too far.

>>212156971
Christ suffered and died in order to conquer Death itself, to save everyone from the greatest enemy. If that's not serious then nothing is.

>>212156846
Paul never said that the Church replaced Israel. Romans 11 literally warns Gentiles not to be arrogant and says God hasn't rejected His people.

The actual verse you're talking to:
>Galatians 6:16
>Peace and mercy be upon all who walk by this rule, and upon the Israel of God
The meaning it's not clear by the text alone. Scholars think it refers specifically to Jewish believers, not the whole Church. Again, the idea that the Church is the “true Israel” only really gained traction after 100 AD.

>>212156992
>says God hasn't rejected His people.
Yes that is correct because many of the Jews worshipped Jesus, thus the church was born.
The ones who rejected Jesus abandoned God because Jesus is God.

>>212157046
>Romans 11 literally warns Gentiles not to be arrogant and says God hasn't rejected His people.
Yeah as long as His people have accepted Christ as the Messiah. Jews who not only don't accept Him as the Messiah but hate and spit at him aren't His people.

>>212156369 (OP)
usa pipo should not be allowed to appropriate our language like this

>>212157046
I already explained why you are wrong.

>>212156972
Do these retards actually think ancient hebrews dressed like that?
What's up with the haircut too? Silly beyond belief

>>212157039
I don't believe that's true

>>212157074
that clothing style is actually modern and brought by ashkenazis

>>212157046
>Again, the idea that the Church is the “true Israel” only really gained traction after 100 AD.
Stop acting like you know what you are talking about when you don't have a clue.

>>212157032
>Al Qaeda and all the wahhabists/salafists are purists.
If that was the case they would be shiites. It's clear that Muhammad(pbuh) wanted Ali to succeed him

>>212157068
You niggas were speaking Yiddish and Arabic less than 80 years ago

>>212156432
he's not jewish, just a schizo using their religion to justify his retarded things

>>212157097
Okay

>>212157046
>Scholars think it refers specifically to Jewish believers, not the whole Church.
What a stupid retarded theory. That makes literally no sense at all in the context of everything else that Paul ever said.
Why would you ever listen to these gay scholars

>>212157068
what lil yosef gon do?

>>212157046
Jesus Himself told them that the Kingdom would be taken from them.
"Replacement" is not the right word because it still is the same Kingdom but it no longer is exclusive to the nation of Israel. Romans makes this clear.

Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.

What kind of mental gymnastics are at work here to twist that verse and claim it doesnt mean what it actually means?

>>212157236
What do you think it means? It is one tree and those who rejected Him are cut off, so they are not Israel anymore, regardless of their genetic lineage.
This is not hard to understand. Paul makes it very simple.

>>212157265
Oh and like I said earlier, all of this is foreshadowed in the Old Testament by the way. This didn't just come out of nowhere all the sudden. Isaac was of Abraham's seed by the promise.

>>212156369 (OP)
In all fairness Arizona has been infamous for being home to some of the craziest people in the country and is renowned for being an international crime hub. Timothy McVeigh infamously loved and spent tons of time in Arizona before the bombing.
Also fun fact: Steven Spielberg grew up in Phoenix.
>>212156432
They did this to the Britishers with King David and similar attacks, would not be surprising at all to see attacks by Zionist radicals later on.

>>212156994
Matthew 21:43 does say the Kingdom will be taken and given to a nation producing its fruits.
>Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruits

That’s not the same as saying: "Israel is permanently replaced by the Church." That interpretation came later.

Even Paul, writing after Jesus, is careful in Romans 11 to say Israel isn’t rejected, and he warns Gentile believers against being arrogant.

>>212157029
You don’t have to trust scholars, but just calling everyone you disagree with “homosexual atheists” doesn’t make your argument stronger.

>>212157057
Romans 11:1 says:
>I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? Far from it! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

It even calls unbelieving Jews beloved for the sake of the fathers, see Romans 11:28:
>In relation to the gospel they are enemies on your account, but in relation to God’s choice they are beloved on account of the fathers

Paul talks about branches broken off but not destroyed, he says they can be grafted in again if they don’t persist in unbelief. That doesn’t sound like a total cutoff.

>>212157229
Sure, Jesus says the Kingdom would be taken from them and given to a people producing its fruits.
>Matthew 21:43
>>Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruits

He doesn’t say Israel is erased or that God’s covenant is abolished. Romans backs that up: the Kingdom is expanded, not replaced. Gentiles are grafted in, but Israel isn’t thrown out. Paul is clear in Romans 11:29:
>for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.

>>212157326
>he says they can be grafted in again if they don’t persist in unbelief.
Yes of course they can. No one said otherwise.
You are arguing against something that no one claimed.
They are cut off as long as they remain in unbelief.
You are not arguing rationally.

>>212157265
The apostle Paul taught the early churches that God’s covenants with Israel do not belong to the church and will yet be fulfilled. Consider the following clear teaching from Romans 11 which answers the question, “Hath God cast away his people?”

>Paul answers the question, “Hath God cast away his people?” with an emphatic expression of negation, “God forbid.”
Paul proves that God has not permanently cast away Israel by the fact that there is presently a remnant, of which he is a member (Ro. 11:1-5). The nation Israel is preserved before God through the believing remnant. This has always been the true Israel (Ro. 9:6-8).
The present fall of Israel has a divine purpose, that of bringing salvation to the Gentiles, and Israel’s fall is not permanent but will end in their fulness (Ro. 11:11-12).

>The same Israel that has been cast away will be reconciled (Ro. 11:15).
Israel is likened to an olive tree. Branches have been broken off, but the tree remains (Ro. 11:17-24). When Israel ceases to abide in unbelief, they will be saved or “graffed into their own olive tree.”

>Israel’s present blindness will only last until the end of the church age “until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in” (Ro. 11:25).

>Israel will be saved at the coming of Christ and God’s covenant will be fulfilled in them (Ro. 11:26-27). Paul gives a general reference to the New Covenant which is God’s promise to convert Israel and forgive her sin and give her a new heart of obedience (Jer. 31:31-34; 32:38-40). In that day, “there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness” (Zec. 13:1).

>>212157326
>"Israel is permanently replaced by the Church." That interpretation came later.
I already explained this to you.
It is not a "replacement" so stop saying that. Israel is the church. The church is Israel.
If you still don't get it by now I have to assume you are being willfully blind.

>>212157409
>muh semantics
Kek

>>212157326
God's covenant is not abolished. God's covenant is fullfilled in Christ.
The Jews, like everyone else, can either accept that or reject it. Those who reject it are cut off.
Stop being disingenuous. This is not hard to understand.

>Thread about a religious schizo becomes a thread for religious nonsense.

>>212157451
The fool says in his heart "There is no God."

>>212156432
>us
right

The only people as annoying and dishonest as dispensational zionists are Roman Papists. It is hard to tell which is worse.

>>212157376
Fair enough. My point was just to push back against the idea that Israel was permanently replaced or that unbelieving Jews are no longer “His people” in any sense. Romans 11 makes it clear that even in unbelief they’re still called beloved for the sake of the fathers and that God’s gifts and calling are irrevocable.

>>212157409
You're saying “Israel is the Church”, but that IS a theological interpretation, not something Jesus or Paul explicitly said. That concept developed after 100 AD, once the Church had become mostly Gentile and separated from Jewish believers.

I say it again, Romans 11 doesn’t say “the Church is Israel.” It says Gentiles are grafted in among the remnant of Israel, not that they become Israel. Paul still calls ethnic Israel “His people”, even in unbelief.

If we’re serious about what the text actually says, then it’s not blindness, it’s caution against reading later ideas back into Scripture.

>>212157447
I’m not denying that Christ is seen as the fulfillment of the covenant in Christian belief. What I’m questioning is the idea that Israel, as a people, has been fully and permanently cut off.

Paul clearly says otherwise in Romans 11. He writes that God has not rejected His people and even calls them beloved for the sake of the fathers. He also describes their future return if they do not persist in unbelief.

This is not about rejecting or accepting doctrine. It’s about what the text actually says, and Paul leaves room for Israel to remain part of God’s ongoing purpose.

>>212157491
A lot of Papalists are also Zionists now too like that Bishop Barron guy on youtube. He even said that Jews can go to heaven without Jesus because they follow Jewish law or some vague so-called "Judeo-Christian morality" (whatever that is supposed to mean).
All of this contradicts the Scriptures. Jesus says
>I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man cometh unto the Father but by Me.

>>212157505
>What I’m questioning is the idea that Israel, as a people, has been fully and permanently cut off.
They chose that outcome. They want it to be that way. Their pride has occluded them from God's love (again)

>>212157601
Yes, however (I think this might be where the Peruvian anon is getting confused) a Jewish person can still leave Judaism and be grafted back onto the tree by believing in Christ. But otherwise yes you are right.

>>212156369 (OP)
Yes the dangers of circumcision.

>>212157601
>>212157680
Appreciate the responses. I’m not confused. I understand that individuals, including Jews, can be grafted back in through belief. My point throughout has simply been that Romans 11 presents a tension, not a total cutoff. Paul acknowledges unbelief but still calls them beloved and warns Gentiles not to grow arrogant.

You may see rejection, Paul sees a mystery and a future restoration. That’s all I’ve been trying to say.

Anyway, I’ll leave it there for now. Thanks for the discussion, and good night.