>>212217416 (OP)You know, if it were like 20 or 30 years ago I'd think "oh alright that's fine, it's kinda understandable for him to lack foresight, when something seems good on a surface level who can really compare what's the benefits to the losses or try to imagine what the endgoal of the ideology they're supporting leads to". But we're not 20 or 30 years ago. You can already see what being a firstie leads to. So what else is there? Is it retardation? Is it propaganda? Is it just plain ignorance? Is it an idea that somehow the upsides make up for the downsides? How can someone still be mentally limited enough to believe that the fate of "first world nations" is some desirable endgoal? Wow.