>>212278013 (OP)
Cousin...
Why would roman catholics betray their fellow roman catholic from finishing the ottoman sultan, if papists claim he was one of them?
Doesn't make sense, don't it.
Transubstantiation is still anathema.
The papacy lost the primacy for betraying emperors, and with it the “institution” of the church with it.
Filioque did this.
The Holy Spirit is a woman.
{A daughter he didn't acknowledged nor knew about?}
The ottomans got the courage against him after he died to steal his corpse/head as trophy.
None of that would've happened if the papist nobility, royalty, and a part of the clergy wouldn't have been hot mad that an Orthodox would've struck the fatal blow against the ottoman head, instead of one of their own by affiliation. This is why his story is both a tragedy and revealing.
By not helping him when he needed to finish the job, it was made crystal clear of the dysfunction of the whole feudal metapolitics in Europe, if only by religious affiliation.
Even by scriptorium standards, this is weak, frater.
Be wise.
