>>212374681
>>212374428
>>212374105
So let me get this straight: feminists consider pornography made to appeal to men as “sexist”, “problematic”, “misogynistic”, “patriarchal”, “gender-based violence”, “porn-sick”, even though the people involved in that porn are either consenting adults, or completely fictional adults, engaging in normal heterosexual acts. But you expect us to sympathise with a bunch of degenerate foids getting their faggot porn banned? Nice joke.
And as
>>212374604
>>212374570
pointed out, banning faggot porn was part of a wider trend of China cracking down on porn, not that I support such censorship. But if China was ONLY cracking down on straight porn made to appeal to men, the BBC would right articles celebrating that.