Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:29:17 AM No.212396554
Thank you!
Replies:
When I say thank you, you say Comrade Stalin! - /int/ (#212396554) [Archived: 605 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:32:33 AM No.212396614
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:38:19 AM No.212396721
>>212396621
the sabre grandpa used to split bolshevik skulls in half is still in the family, just saying
the sabre grandpa used to split bolshevik skulls in half is still in the family, just saying
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:41:06 AM No.212396765
>>212396554 (OP)
You would get shot in the back of your head. Stop larping, mutt.
You would get shot in the back of your head. Stop larping, mutt.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:45:36 AM No.212396836
>>212396721
>has to go back a century to the one time his cunt didn't get owned
kek
>>212396765
>I would be a part of a rightist trotskyist bloc
huh?
>has to go back a century to the one time his cunt didn't get owned
kek
>>212396765
>I would be a part of a rightist trotskyist bloc
huh?
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:47:35 AM No.212396866
>>212396554 (OP)
He was neither a comrade, nor his real name was Stalin. He wasn't even Russian.
He was neither a comrade, nor his real name was Stalin. He wasn't even Russian.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:48:41 AM No.212396882
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:49:25 AM No.212396897
>>212396554 (OP)
good job creating Israel.
good job creating Israel.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:49:34 AM No.212396899
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:54:37 AM No.212396957
>>212396554 (OP)
Stalin didn’t go far enough with his purges. People like Khrushchev should have been killed. The reason China’s CPC still stands today is because they didn’t denounce Maos cult of personality
Stalin didn’t go far enough with his purges. People like Khrushchev should have been killed. The reason China’s CPC still stands today is because they didn’t denounce Maos cult of personality
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 2:57:42 AM No.212396998
>>212396899
>gets owned so hard he has to resort to supposed greentext violations
concession accepted
>>212396957
correct, Beria too since he was also likely in on the poisoning. Also the doctor's plot was real.
>gets owned so hard he has to resort to supposed greentext violations
concession accepted
>>212396957
correct, Beria too since he was also likely in on the poisoning. Also the doctor's plot was real.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 3:04:58 AM No.212397112
>>212396721
Invades Soviet Union, gets stomped and chased all the way back to Warsaw, manages to avoid total capitulation = Polish victory
Invades Soviet Union, gets stomped and chased all the way back to Warsaw, manages to avoid total capitulation = Polish victory
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 3:34:53 AM No.212397520
>>212396998
If someone was purged they should have also purged all his family members since most family members think the same
The state must never admit fault in anything.
If someone was purged they should have also purged all his family members since most family members think the same
The state must never admit fault in anything.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:04:23 AM No.212399461
>>212396554 (OP)
thank you
thank you
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:05:15 AM No.212399472
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:18:58 AM No.212399609
>>212399472
He's mostly right about that. They only half-heartedly denounced the Cultural Revolution chimpout, whereas in the USSR, the entire figure of Stalin was completely delegitimised after Khrushchev took over. There's "destalinization" but there is no "demaoization".
Moral of the story for any state regardless of ideology: never say you did anything wrong in the past because that weakens authority, which is bad because states are built on authority.
He's mostly right about that. They only half-heartedly denounced the Cultural Revolution chimpout, whereas in the USSR, the entire figure of Stalin was completely delegitimised after Khrushchev took over. There's "destalinization" but there is no "demaoization".
Moral of the story for any state regardless of ideology: never say you did anything wrong in the past because that weakens authority, which is bad because states are built on authority.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:32:52 AM No.212399741
>>212399609
There's no functional difference. Stalin was gone, "de-Stalinisation" was merely realigning policy with what the new guys wanted to do. And it wasn't nearly as critical as it became in late Perestroika and after the collapse. The Soviet government still refused to fully publish certain facts like the Katyn massacre, de-kulakisation, the Holodomor, the totality of the purges etc. The cult was wound back but never totally erased and many Stalinists retained their positions.
Xiaoping did just the same. They coped by saying Mao was "70% good, 30% bad", which is more or less the exact same line the Soviets took to Stalin.
There's no functional difference. Stalin was gone, "de-Stalinisation" was merely realigning policy with what the new guys wanted to do. And it wasn't nearly as critical as it became in late Perestroika and after the collapse. The Soviet government still refused to fully publish certain facts like the Katyn massacre, de-kulakisation, the Holodomor, the totality of the purges etc. The cult was wound back but never totally erased and many Stalinists retained their positions.
Xiaoping did just the same. They coped by saying Mao was "70% good, 30% bad", which is more or less the exact same line the Soviets took to Stalin.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:38:08 AM No.212399808
>>212396554 (OP)
His real surname was Jugashvili. He was cruel, illiterate tyrant, coward and mass murderer. When he had a stroke no one around helped that bastard. Everybody were happy to see him lying in a pool of his own piss and dying slowly.
His real surname was Jugashvili. He was cruel, illiterate tyrant, coward and mass murderer. When he had a stroke no one around helped that bastard. Everybody were happy to see him lying in a pool of his own piss and dying slowly.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:01:47 AM No.212400091
>>212399741
There can't be any "functional difference" because this was a battle of ideals and propaganda. The Soviet government only refused to shed full light on those atrocities because it reflected badly on them too.
The loyal Stalinists (like Molotov) were given irrelevant roles and then kicked out of the party itself several years later. Khrushchev himself was a Stalinist during Stalin's reign but he explicitly denounced Stalin.
Deng never explicitly denounced Mao but only said Mao had flaws, which is not a denouncement. For Stalin, the official line was more like "30% good, 70% bad". China today still has a Mao cult. He's even on the money. Stalin had no cult after Khrushchev.
There can't be any "functional difference" because this was a battle of ideals and propaganda. The Soviet government only refused to shed full light on those atrocities because it reflected badly on them too.
The loyal Stalinists (like Molotov) were given irrelevant roles and then kicked out of the party itself several years later. Khrushchev himself was a Stalinist during Stalin's reign but he explicitly denounced Stalin.
Deng never explicitly denounced Mao but only said Mao had flaws, which is not a denouncement. For Stalin, the official line was more like "30% good, 70% bad". China today still has a Mao cult. He's even on the money. Stalin had no cult after Khrushchev.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:15:52 AM No.212400270
>>212400091
Just not the case. Stalin continued to be open to personal reverence, just not at the same, state-sponsored scale he had been in life. 30/70 is wrong. 50-50 at worst, though more realistically the same 70-30. As much as Khrushchev personally might have wanted to take more steps against him, millions continued to hold him up as the victor of the War and that could never be taken away from him. To this day Stalin still polls highly among Russians.
Just because some notable Stalinists like Molotov were demoted doesn't mean anything. That's a shallow observation. The CPSU remained filled with cadres who made their bones under Stalin, they were never purged to any serious degree, and the Union under Khrushchev continued most of Stalin's policies. There was little rollback outside of some relaxations on cultural censorship and mass executions/ imprisonment, but they never stopped persecutions, they just shifted to other means.
Suslov was a known Stalinist and he continued as the party's chief ideologist for decades as a counterpoint.
That Xiaoping never said "Mao was a cunt" in the same way Khrushchev did doesn't change anything. They both adopted reformist agendas that would have seen them executed by their predecessor.
Just not the case. Stalin continued to be open to personal reverence, just not at the same, state-sponsored scale he had been in life. 30/70 is wrong. 50-50 at worst, though more realistically the same 70-30. As much as Khrushchev personally might have wanted to take more steps against him, millions continued to hold him up as the victor of the War and that could never be taken away from him. To this day Stalin still polls highly among Russians.
Just because some notable Stalinists like Molotov were demoted doesn't mean anything. That's a shallow observation. The CPSU remained filled with cadres who made their bones under Stalin, they were never purged to any serious degree, and the Union under Khrushchev continued most of Stalin's policies. There was little rollback outside of some relaxations on cultural censorship and mass executions/ imprisonment, but they never stopped persecutions, they just shifted to other means.
Suslov was a known Stalinist and he continued as the party's chief ideologist for decades as a counterpoint.
That Xiaoping never said "Mao was a cunt" in the same way Khrushchev did doesn't change anything. They both adopted reformist agendas that would have seen them executed by their predecessor.