>During World War II, a devastating famine in Bengal killed around 3 million people.

>When informed of the suffering, Churchill reportedly said the famine was Indians’ own fault for "breeding like rabbits."

>>212578898 (OP)
I mean he's not wrong

>>212578898 (OP)
He's right

>>212578898 (OP)
Churchill might have been evil but this is morally correct

Stronger ones happened before bongs came there, it's caused by natural processes in the jungle, spewing rats into the fields every xx years and some instances are particularly nasty

>>212578898 (OP)
Indians will make excuses as if this wasn’t something that happened regularly there

>>212578898 (OP)
Shashi tharoor had a take on this
British famines killed up to 80 million in over 20 famines
History scope and wion had videos on it . Basically it was taxing them and taking grains from the country
India produced the most soldiers and materials for the war, without their help the allieds would’ve lost.
Sikhs and Gurkhas gave Japan their worst defeat in imphal.
They should’ve stayed neutral like Ireland and Switzerland
It’s deserved that they are taking over uk

>>212579443
saar you bastard britisher give bharat 5000 gazillion pound sterlings you stolen from colony SAAAAR

>>212579421
Nope not as bad YouTube it
Way worse then potato famine

>>212579443
25% of worlds wealth at the time when British showed up
Wasn’t as severe as under British rule
Serious documentaries show this

>>212579819
>>212579937
>>212579981
Made any prostitutes bleed recently, sanjeet?

>>212579819
>>212579937
>>212579981
True
Britishers stole your testosterone and penis
Sad for indian boy

>>212580422

Says Sven from his Cuck Shed

>>212580422
Low muscle mass tho

>>212580589
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
A
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A.
A
A
A
A
R

>>212578898 (OP)
No other nation comes close to the historical revisionism of indian nationalists