I did psychedelics last year and now I'm convinced that we are living in some sort of computational simulated reality.

Through the process of ontological reasoning, I came to the simple conclusion that there has to be some sort of creator to this reality. This creator of the universe has to be omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent and we are just sims in his game.

Non-locality is already proven to be true. I wouldnt be surprised if AI advances so rapidly especially with the aid of quantum computing that eventually it will be able to develop new mathematical theories and models that prove the existence of God.

>>212637063 (OP)
I love psychedelics, but I never became deluded like that

funny how before computers we went from believing this world is a lie pulled over eyes to after computers believing that we live in a simulation

it's all the same

>>212637063 (OP)
That's a really nerdy way of saying you believe in God.

>>212637063 (OP)
weak bitch can't even handle drugs

>>212637153
this, honestly the whole "we live in a heckin simulation bro" is just a gayer version of buddhism/hindusim

>>212637063 (OP)
NEW scientific theories say that we are probably living inside a black hole and that what we know as "The Big Bang" was actually the collapse of a star under its own gravity, compressing all it's matter into a singularity that created the black hole we're living in

>>212637170
>is just a gayer version of buddhism/hindusim
hindus were right though
>>212637153
I do. But I dont think God being real = good, tbqh.

>>212637247
>But I dont think God being real = good, tbqh.
Also not a novel idea in theology.

>>212637063 (OP)
>non locality is already proven to be true

What does that mean and how was it proven?

>>212637219
How does a single star get enough mass to eventually become a whole universe with countless galaxies with countless stars? Where does the mass come from?

>>212637255
>Also not a novel idea in theology.
so what?

>>212637325
So if you want to read about it, you probably can.

>>212637063 (OP)
>>212637063 (OP)
Read on Jacobo Grinberg, bro was onto something until he dissapeared.

> Mexican neurophysiologist and psychologist. He studied Mexican shamanism, Eastern disciplines, meditation, astrology and telepathy through the scientific method.

> The Syntergic Field: According to Grinberg, this field is a fundamental layer of reality, underlying all of existence. It contains all possible experiences and states of consciousness, functioning similarly to the quantum field in physics, where all potentialities exist until observed. The brain, in Grinberg's theory, doesn't generate consciousness on its own but rather acts as a receiver or tuner that interacts with the syntergic field. The brain's neural networks "collapse" this field into a coherent reality, similar to how a radio picks up specific frequencies from the air. Grinberg suggested that what we perceive as reality is a co-creation between the brain and the syntergic field. Our perceptions are not merely reflections of an external world but are shaped by the brain's interaction with this universal consciousness.

>>212637349
thanks, please feel free to recommend something if you have any recommendations

>>212637351
thanks anon. I was amazed with his story and theories when I found out about him. Theres an excellent documentary that was released a couple of years ago, dont remember the name but its very good

>>212637301
>What does that mean and how was it proven?
it means that shit is not as real as it seems
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/

>>212637493
What are the implications of that?

>>212637063 (OP)
False! The true is that we are One. God is everything, and all that exists. You are God. I am God. Everything is God. God created the Universe because he (we) hate being completely alone in infinite time, so we created the Universe and sent ourselves into it so we forget that we are God. Once we die, we return (remember) our state as God, and then because we feel the same loneliness, and confusion of our own existence, we send ourselves back into the Universe.

>>212637063 (OP)
You witnessed something greater than yourself. God is a representation because people can't see the whole, can't expound the whole to each other. The word God or allah pbuh is just a word.
Suppose an alien landed and asked you, the modern theist, to explain what the word God means. You probably wouldn't explain the ark or exodus, or any kooky myths. Beyond Jesus, you'd talk mainly about God's power. The creation of the universe, infinite nature of God, omniscience and omnipotence. Perfect forgiveness, morality, truth etc.. Prayer and faith. This one entity, this God, can hold up the weight of the world with one fingernail. If Atlas is a representation of man holding the weight of the world, real God is a representation of man triple reverse dunking the world in a gold plated toilet and surfing the blast wave through spacetime.

Who came up with Him and what changed? Of course God always existed, but representations grew from Atlas because human concepts are still the vehicle for meaning, even with God. The love and the moral strength of God can only come to an advanced civilization full of moral people. Only a fraction of God's wisdom about the future is felt by people, you can sense infinite wisdom because it's infinite relative to you, but all that's available won't save humanity without the actions of men. Compared to God's wisdom ("true knowledge" of the future) it's still nothing. God is so aspirational, He represents the 99% of experience, internal and external, for which there is no language. He's the most awe inspiring person, and the most glorious word in the universee.

>>212637063 (OP)

>>212640248