>America pioneers globalization and wins from it more than any other 1st world country, American GDP per capita is 40% larger than German in 2025, meanwhile during the cold war the FDR was on par with America
What the fuck, why the Muritards revolt against their own system that benefited them so much, meanwhile Eurocucks who suffered and stagnated defend it and beg their masters to continue to leech off them?

>>212722667 (OP)
What is this jeet ESL babble?

>>212722701
You are welcome to point out my mistakes

>>212722667 (OP)
I feel like gdp per capita is a shitty metric. The only region in America that genuinely mogs Europe is New England.

>>212722667 (OP)
The Paradox Explained: Americans revolt because globalization’s uneven spoils—skyrocketing CEO pay (344:1 CEO-to-worker ratio in 2020, EPI) and job losses—clash with the narrative of universal prosperity. The U.S.’s “winner-takes-all” system amplifies this; the top 10% capture 45% of income (Piketty, 2020). Europeans, meanwhile, stick with globalization not out of subservience but because their systems mitigate its harms better, and they lack the U.S.’s global dominance to go it alone. The “Eurocuck” label oversimplifies—Germany’s export-driven model and EU integration are strategic, not servile. But both sides face stagnation risks: U.S. tariffs could shave global growth to 2.3% in 2025 (World Bank), and Europe’s energy crisis (post-Ukraine invasion) and aging population (65+ projected to rise 20% by 2030, Eurostat) threaten further decline.

>>212722756
The GDP per capita is fine because it's infinitely easier to redestribute wealth within your country than to make it richer overall. Even "prosperous" countries like Sweden and Finland have been stagnating for more than a decade and their GDP per capita is comparable to their 2008 data. If Americans really wanted to take advantage of their wealth and lift the standards of living, they could have simply introduced more worker-friendly policies instead of tearing up the system that was so enormously beneficial to their wealth. They already have the wealth, they need not to destroy it but to give it to the poor, meanwhile destroying globalization will just hurt both in America