← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 212927919

10 posts 4 images /int/
monoball Brazil No.212927919 [Report] >>212927976 >>212928012 >>212928430
If you believe in deterrence then why are you against third world countries having nukes
Anonymous Estonia No.212927976 [Report] >>212928354
>>212927919 (OP)
usa has the god fgiven right to delete any country from earth
Anonymous Germany No.212928000 [Report] >>212928357
because not all countries are stable/responsible enough to possess them imo. I think nukes should be owned by more countries (Germany included), but not all.
Anonymous Turkey No.212928012 [Report]
>>212927919 (OP)
what does the thing you put on washing machine have to do with nukes
Anonymous Australia No.212928054 [Report]
I don't trust people who can't use a trash can to use a nuke responsibly.
Anonymous Brazil No.212928309 [Report]
It all bottles down to racism. And doesn't hold as a serious argument
No euro country should have access to nukes.
eurangutangs aren't killing each like they been doing non stop since forever because the US is actively retard wrangling them.
Brazil is way more responsible than any of them for exemple. Just imagine a eurangutangs surrounded by weak latrino countries like us. It'd be wars and coups non stop. Just because they aren't currently killing each other doesn't mean they won't revert back to their old ways. And again on this aspect Brazil is better suited since it's history proves it is not a belligerant country by nature.
Anonymous Sweden No.212928331 [Report]
nukes are supposed to be a deterrent against thirdies
Anonymous United States No.212928354 [Report]
>>212927976
Basically this. We have the moral high ground
Anonymous Sweden No.212928357 [Report]
>>212928000
You would trust saudis and brazilians more with nukes than us?
:(
Anonymous South Korea No.212928430 [Report]
>>212927919 (OP)
i support affordable and portable samsung noox for home users