If you believe in deterrence then why are you against third world countries having nukes

>>212927919 (OP)
usa has the god fgiven right to delete any country from earth

because not all countries are stable/responsible enough to possess them imo. I think nukes should be owned by more countries (Germany included), but not all.

>>212927919 (OP)
what does the thing you put on washing machine have to do with nukes

I don't trust people who can't use a trash can to use a nuke responsibly.

It all bottles down to racism. And doesn't hold as a serious argument
No euro country should have access to nukes.
eurangutangs aren't killing each like they been doing non stop since forever because the US is actively retard wrangling them.
Brazil is way more responsible than any of them for exemple. Just imagine a eurangutangs surrounded by weak latrino countries like us. It'd be wars and coups non stop. Just because they aren't currently killing each other doesn't mean they won't revert back to their old ways. And again on this aspect Brazil is better suited since it's history proves it is not a belligerant country by nature.

nukes are supposed to be a deterrent against thirdies

>>212927976
Basically this. We have the moral high ground

>>212928000
You would trust saudis and brazilians more with nukes than us?
:(

>>212927919 (OP)
i support affordable and portable samsung noox for home users