← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 212973648

13 posts 4 images /int/
Anonymous Poland No.212973648 [Report] >>212973691 >>212973737 >>212973782 >>212973803 >>212974005 >>212974057 >>212974100
now that the dust has settled, was it really necessary?
Anonymous Finland No.212973691 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
Yeah? It saved american and japanese lives.
Anonymous United States No.212973703 [Report]
Yes
Anonymous Denmark No.212973706 [Report]
yeah
Anonymous United States No.212973737 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
Absolutely
Anonymous United States No.212973739 [Report]
No
Anonymous Argentina No.212973782 [Report] >>212973891
>>212973648 (OP)
Maybe the first one but the second was unjustifiable.
Anonymous Sweden No.212973803 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
Obviously not. War crime of the highest order. You are not allowed to target civilians even if it would end the war faster.
Anonymous Finland No.212973891 [Report]
>>212973782
>but the second was unjustifiable.
The second one caused the japanese surrender.
Anonymous Spain No.212974005 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
Of course not, Amerimutts are only good at bombing civilians, the Japanese already lost the war after the Battle of Manchuria, but the amerimutts had to please their kike overlords and attack more civilian populations with no strategic value.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.212974057 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
two wasn't enough, should've gone for the hat-trick
Anonymous United States No.212974100 [Report]
>>212973648 (OP)
As necessary as the Soviets invading Manchuria. Imperial Japan soldiers and civilians were pretty much equivalent to today's Islamic extremists in regard to their willingness to die. We could've invaded the home islands and what hold ours happened to be left, but realistically that probably would've lasted until the early 1950s
Anonymous Poland No.212974121 [Report]
atomic sneeding of niggasaki