← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 213442513

10 posts 4 images /int/
Anonymous United States No.213442513 >>213442708 >>213442816 >>213443235
Did you know?
Many linguists posit that many Native American languages such as Navajo and Nahuatl share many similarities to the central asian languages such families (Uralic, Mongolic, Turkic) and believe that they descend from a common ancestor

are there any interesting facts about your language iyc?
Anonymous Mexico No.213442708
>>213442513 (OP)
>your language
I don't even know what my language is.
Anonymous Brazil No.213442816 >>213443500
>>213442513 (OP)
There's a tribe out here that cann't specify past or future. They just described the present. I think it's interesting.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirah%C3%A3_language
Anonymous Mexico No.213443235 >>213443277
l>>213442513 (OP)
nobody thinks that
Anonymous United States No.213443277 >>213443405
>>213443235
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3951421/
Anonymous Mexico No.213443345 >>213443405
those languages are not in central asia and na dene is a specific language family largely confined to northern north america and has nothing to do with nahuatl which is uto-aztecan
Anonymous United States No.213443405 >>213443434
>>213443345
see >>213443277

you are a brother of ancient tur
Anonymous United States No.213443434 >>213443836
>>213443405
ancient turko-finno-ugric-uralian/yenesian pipo *
Anonymous Mexico No.213443500
>>213442816
The Syntax section for the article contradicts your claim, albeit, as it says that there are present, past, and past-immediate verb suffixes, as well as future and past verb suffixes.
Anonymous Mexico No.213443836
>>213443434
Just go full Nostratic bro.