>>213469755From the U.S. perspective, if they promise not to station troops on North Korean soil and then break that promise, it would provoke strong backlash from China and cause major diplomatic controversy. Breaking an agreement with a major power is very different from breaking one with a smaller country.
For this reason, the U.S. would have strong incentives to uphold such a commitment.The U.S. knows that breaking diplomatic promises among great powers damages its global reputation and risks serious geopolitical consequences
Moreover, our priority should be developing North Korean territory rather than focusing on stationing U.S. troops there. . So, such a scenario is highly unlikely to happen.
Also, for Russia, although it shares a border with North Korea, its direct interest in Korean unification is less pronounced compared to China's, especially since Russia's strategic focus is more toward its western borders and Europe. Also, Russia's deteriorating relations with the U.S. do not necessarily translate into control over Korean peninsula affairs.