Thread 213474743

In my country, and in your country too, non-virgin women have absolutely no value for a healthy person.

>>213474743 (OP)
I really don't care about being her first. You may not believe me and say that I am coping, but this is how I really feel.
To be honest, I can't even understand why other men care about it so much. I guess I understand how it would make sense from a evolutionary standpoint, but now that parenthood tests exists, that doesn't really matter.

>gays marrying? THAT DESECRATES MARRIAGE!!!
>tattoed slut with 200 bodies wears a white dress at her wedding despite being non-virgin? Uhhh

Is webm related real in any way? Too lazy to look into it. Do women really retain sperm?

>>213474891
Jesus fucking Christ

>>213474952
Betas will say no, rook at riley reids white son after so much coal
But yeah, it definitely influences the DNA, especially the first dick

>>213474952
no it’s a humorism tier antiquated victorian theory. easily deboonked by the existence of paternity tests

>>213475309
Ok but Victorian Era produced good literature soooooo...

>>213475309
DOGFUCKING KIKE

>>213474743 (OP)
>and yes, Im rich
100% soy redditor cuck

>>213474952
Yeah they store sperm in a sack like ant queens

>>213476002
i’m a man however. you need medication stat

>>213476822
What an ugly fucking foot

>>213476855
i accept your concession

>>213474743 (OP)
just cuckmaxx

>>213474891
The idea of having another person's sloppy seconds isn't appealing. statically speaking you're also significantly less likely to divorce if both partners are each other's first. I think it was like 5 percent chance of separation happening within the first 5 years compared to 20 percent by those who've had 1-2 partners prior to the marriage and the percentage grows with the more sexual partner you've had. Seeing how divorce is pretty common nowadays, it's not far out of the imagination to say that people's sexual past play a role in it. We also have to keep in mind that it was only recently socially acceptable for people to have had multiple relationships, so who knows maybe there is a biological reason why we've been monogamous for thousands of years.

>>213474743 (OP)
What matters is who gets her pregnant. Sex without that is just masturbation

>>213474743 (OP)
your country is in the middle of a bloody war, at least one third of its population has left, God knows how many have died, and you concern yourself with shit like this?

>>213478552
Nothing ever happens though

Even in conservative turd world shitholes it's rare to find an unfucked permavirgin qt after age 20-21.

If they still are that means they're hambeasts or downright ghastly and revolting.

If they're cute/pretty/early bloomer some guy already cummed inside her before she finishes uni.

>>213474891
DOGFUCKING
RAPED
KIKE

>>213474743 (OP)
The real good answer is not mentioned in the post.
Its to keep fucking as many women as you can on the side, at least as much as her number.
Use hookers if you cant pull much.

>>213474891
same

>>213474952
>I'm a neuroscientist
pressing X to that

>>213474891
It depends how you view sex i guess, if you see it like a special moment you together as a couple, i get how it can be bothering if your wife fucked like 200 dudes before, clearly its not so special for her.

I just think cum is gross and don't like the idea that some guy's cum is been in/on the woman I'm with

>>213480379
there’s cum inside you RIGHT NOW!

>>213478503
This. My first wife was a 9/10 virgin and we fucked all the time, but she ended up with some other dude and gave him kids instead. She told me I ruined her for other men, but that doesn't make you feel any better as some might think it would