← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 213477476

20 posts 14 images /int/
Anonymous Thailand No.213477476 >>213477783 >>213477881 >>213478061
Show me a more beautiful aircraft carrier
I'll wait.
Anonymous Finland No.213477550
t. jean
Anonymous Germany No.213477660 >>213477783 >>213477838
I like the new British ones, don't @ me about the ramp
Anonymous United States No.213477783
>>213477476 (OP)
>857 feet
Little baby carrier
>>213477660
I will
>a fucking RAMP
Anonymous Thailand No.213477838
>>213477660
>don't @ me about the ramp
No need. You are just wrong, there's nothing aesthetic about it.
Anonymous Canada No.213477849 >>213477910
aircraft carrier and beauty do not belong in the same sentence unfortunately.
Anonymous United States No.213477881 >>213477970
>>213477476 (OP)
Nautical Thaibro! We missed you mate
Anonymous United States No.213477910
>>213477849
exactly what a country with no carriers would say
Anonymous Thailand No.213477970
>>213477881
I never sail far from familiar shores, cadet.
Anonymous United States No.213477990 >>213478017 >>213478166
You are like little baby
Anonymous Germany No.213478017
>>213477990
lewd
Anonymous Malta No.213478061 >>213478089 >>213478092 >>213478098 >>213480014
>>213477476 (OP)
wouldn't these be immediately sunk in a hot conflict, with a few missiles?
Anonymous United States No.213478089 >>213478190
>>213478061
no
Anonymous Germany No.213478092 >>213478190
>>213478061
maybe, maybe not
they have warships protecting them and there are countermesasures against missiles and missile launch platforms
Anonymous United States No.213478098 >>213478190
>>213478061
maybe, but modern carriers are always in a group of other war ships so there will be a lot of weapons to shoot down incoming bombs and missiles
Anonymous United Kingdom No.213478166
>>213477990
id love to know how much just that little radar guy on the left side cost. maybe its a SAM array who knows
Anonymous Malta No.213478190 >>213478256
>>213478089
because?
>>213478092
>>213478098
only one missile needs to slip through, and it seems to me that developing an evading missile will always be easier than developing an intercepting missile
Anonymous United States No.213478256
>>213478190
No missile moves faster than light
Anonymous Norway No.213480014
>>213478061
no. first of all the ocean is bigger than you think, you need to know where it is in order to shoot missiles at it. satellites doesnt help, by the time you have found it and issued a missile order its gone.
the anti missile systems on just one arleigh burke class is formidable in itself and there are multiple of its class or smaller, maybe some other nato ships just for the hell of it plus a few subs in a carrier strike group. the deck of an american carrier is at any time the best defended place to be on this earth.
Anonymous Argentina No.213480187
did china build a replica of this one in their desert?