Some UK users on the YouTube subreddit are reporting that their VPNs are being detected and blocked by the platform

vpns are ridiculously easy to detect and have been so since their inception, letting people use vpn on your site is a choice

They voted for this.
They deserve their surveillance state.

>>213484103 (OP)
the internet was never autonomous lmao, what the fuck
leftoids want online pedos and neo-nazis to be canceled and rightoids want online pedos and tankies to be doxxed so they can target them, both are getting what they want now, simple as that

>>213484549
Im so tired of hearing what the left and right wants. I think it's time we listen to what forwards and backwards want

>>213484954
I want to move my cock forwards and backwards inside your moms vagina
if you know what I mean

>>213485025
Sorry, I dont get it

BASED

>>213484512
This was a uniparty effort, started by the conservatives, finished by labour. Democracy in this country is a meme.

>>213484512
We were never asked for this. No party ever promised to censor the internet if they won

>>213485076
bing bing bing wahooo
if you catch my drift

>>213485268
Thank you Right Wing Christians!

>>213484512
Go back to your Indian flag dude. I'm sorry I called you out earlier

>>213485538
It's not even just right wing christians, they probably wanted it but it was pushed through by a hindu, then put into action by radical feminists. It's every loathable demographic in the UK coming together to make everyones lives just slightly worse.

>>213485476
Use small words, Im not so bright

>>213485572
i've been warning of the terf-christcuck alliance for some time now, but /pol/chuds have either not listened at all, or they've shown their brownness and screamed "death to freedumb!!!1!"
now the terf island has surpassed the terf peninsula to become the most powerful internet censor in the first world
as schizophrenic as it sounds, i'm increasingly convinced that tranny porn is the most powerful weapon to break this simp matrix

>>213484512
we'll get the same bullshit in the EU, only 2 MEPs out of like 700 voted against

>>213485331
I thought the Chan was shut down in the UK because they couldn’t verify ID, or are the blue boards still good?

>>213487003
Kek did you fall for that fake 4chan announcement screenshot?

>>213485268
There is another

>>213485268
Democrazy is meme lmao

>>213485268
grim

>>213485331
Brexit means Brexit.

>>213487082
>but admit they don't know how
how about being a responsible parent?

>>213484549
You must be super young.

>>213487082
These retards just want to be the GOP. Saying whatever the fuck they want and with a media apparatus backing them up so they never have to follow through on any of it

Youtube keeps trying to tell me I have two more videos to disable my adblocker before I get blocked but it never happens

>>213487082
Reform will only do that if it happens to somehow be beneficial to Israel.

>>213488476
youtube code is too old
they should just accept they lost to adblockers and move on honestly

>>213487082
>Don't know how
The fact that they're framing this as if they don't impose draconian laws on the internet and expose everyone's identity, they are somehow letting child molesters win, and that this is the only way and is necessary, is just disingenuous.

Does anyone, even the UK government, honestly believe that these measures will have a significant impact on hindering child abuse, let alone ending it entirely? Of course not. This is just another excuse to attain more power and abuse their control over the masses.

Hearing this is like hearing my government say that banning all firearms and installing surveillance cameras everywhere would end crime. It didn't, and criminal activity is actually higher than it was years ago when guns were allowed and cameras weren't everywhere.

Are they going to stop banning guns and installing cameras? No, clearly they need more power and control to solve a problem that actually benefits them if they don't solve it.

How the hell do people not see through this? The UK government didn't do anything when those foreign gangs were literally prostituting local children because they thought it would be racist to point out the obvious.

They're not going to solve child abuse or online suicides because that means they have to give up the power they have now.

It just doesn't make sense to me that any person thinks that a organization that actively exists to a certain solve problem and their reason for having a livelihood would actually attempt to solve that problem.

>>213488608
In the third world, and even in second world countries like Russia. Things like CSAM laws aren't really enforced online. Now what's happening as the internet becomes majority third world, is big tech platforms, like Instagram, Twitter, etc, are just leaning into third world behaviors, standards and habits. Western countries can no longer dictate the standard as they're now a relatively smaller market.

Elon buying twitter only brought the general trajectory of twitter 2 years forward. Instagram and all the other platforms are now chud central, and facebook in their reels have apparently had CSAM for years and done nothing about it. Western progressives are now having to hide on their own websites, like on Bluesky. Why are they having to hide? Because western tech companies now reflect the will of the global majority.

The whole thing about the British child safety law that's going on at the moment isn't entirely some cynical powergrab. It may be that in part, but I genuinely believe western countries are seeing big tech basically tell them that racism and child sexualization will be on their platforms, and to deal with it. What can they actually do as a western country? You can't ask them to censor it, because they'll move their servers to Uzbekistan or Thailand or wherever. Westerners will visit their site with a VPN anyway, so it's not like you'll lose significant numbers. In 2009 having your website cut off from France would be 10% of your audience, now it's maybe 2%.

>>213488865
>What can they actually do as a western country?
Nothing? It's up to parents to monitor what content their children is accessing. Governments are supposed to support the freedom of their people, not ban everything that might offend their sensibilities

Lol now all China youtube glazers are gonna die

>>213487415
KEK

>>213487415

>>213488865
I don't think you use twitter if you think that's the case and are just hearing things through osmosis. Also you're way too gullible and forgiving if you think the censorship has anything to do with what you're talking about.