>>213546538 (OP)
I still don't understand how this shit even happened. Did whichever retard was in charge have an AI as their data layer?
If the AI is just writing code it shouldn't have access to production data. Anyways, or were they just injecting new code into the live system?
Make it make sense
>>213547098
Yep pretty much.
It's a coding style for people who cannot code. The term was coined by some actual programmer and he didn't use it negatively, but I imagine he knows enough about safety to only recommend it for people's private small scale projects.
>>213547060
It kind of makes sense since people blog about failures and outages online as well as the steps on what happened.
So there's no reason why AI can't absorb it. AI doesn't really know good from bad, just what's next.