Historical records and estimations suggest that in 1000 BC, the world population was around 50 million people. However, there is no evidence to support the claim that half of this population was Indian.
While the exact population of the Indian subcontinent in 1000 BC is uncertain, estimations suggest it was between 30 and 86 million people. Some studies estimate the population was approximately 58 million at that time. Comparing this to the world population estimate of 50 million, it is evident that such a large percentage (potentially exceeding 100%) is implausible.
It is important to note that ancient population figures are estimations and can vary significantly depending on the source and methodology used
>>213557183
Is this just counting Indians in India? Or Indians-lite (Pakis, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankans, Nepalis, Myanmar maybe, etc) and those abroad? Because as much as my other reply was a joke, I'd genuinely be surprised if they aren't pushing at least 1/3
>>213557246
It includes migration
Masaman did it
30million out of a billion is drop in the bucket
Remember there’s a billion people outside of Europe with European dna
